Archive Boards > General Live Poker Discussion

QUIZ QUESTION

<< < (5/5)

ian.ski309:

--- Quote from: AMRN on December 06, 2011, 09:18:35 AM ---  and the guy with Q3 who knew he had no right to the pot was a cheat.
--- End quote ---


^^^^  this


The dealer should receive strong "words of advice" from his/her employer, and the guy with Q3... I"d never want him at the same table as me.

pokerpops:

--- Quote from: AMRN on December 06, 2011, 09:18:35 AM ---
Yup - in tournament play, the cards speak and the best hand wins.... All players have a responsibility to ensure that the integrity of the game is maintained, and should speak up to assist the dealer in this instance.  


those who kept quiet did the wrong thing.... and the guy with Q3 who knew he had no right to the pot was a cheat.



--- End quote ---



was this self-deal? In which case the rest of the players have even more of a responsibilty to speak up

BOINGBLITZ:
It was DEALER-dealt. It was,as I said, a little surreal and very strange.  The tournament hadn"t been running long and I convinced myself I had missed something. Only after the other guys agreed did I realise I hadn"t been wrong after all.

Swinebag:
before we all start picking on Brian.......again, I think this is actually a common mnistake.

It has arisen because the 3Q guy has used both his cards to house up whereas the 57 guy has only used 1.

I have seen this before in a pub game and most of the table needed convincing which hand had won.

Obviously, you should have said something Bri, but I can see why/how you were stunned into silence.

Thats 2 BCPCers who owe me beers now for winning their competitions

I run sooooooooo good

WYoung83:
 I wouldnt loose sleep over it Brian. Its obv the dealers fault, he didnt do his job correctly. And if the guy who dragged the pot knew that it wasnt his, then this is very bad and border cheating. Its these two who should feel guilty and not you Brian.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page