Poker Forum > General Discussion
Cash Tour 2012
MintTrav:
--- Quote from: Delboy on December 21, 2011, 00:54:57 AM ---
--- Quote from: MintTrav on December 20, 2011, 23:27:52 PM ---
So the highest winners from the first round go into the second round, several of them then lose chips (maybe everything) and end up worse off than some of those knocked out in the first round.
What about banking a certain amount of the first round winnings?
--- End quote ---
No weeding aloud, they either quit with the lot or continue with the lot. besides the binds will be higher so you probably need bigger stacks.
Des, are you able to rebuy in Phase 2
--- End quote ---
If the stacks remained similar to the first round, then so would the blinds, obv.
JStarkey:
Personally I hate the concept. If I wanted to spend my sunday playing cashgames I could stay at home and grind it down my local where I"m not capped to a 100BB buyin, and where I know the game is profitable. Will the Casino not have cash games running simultaniously on the sunday anyway?
Bainn:
Now this, re OP is a very interesting idea, may it prove popular and continue through 2012.
AJDUK:
I don"t like this idea at all. I also don"t like the idea of APAT ever being targetted at "higher end cash players". The first A in APAT stands for "Amateur". To me that means recreational. Take all APAT branding off it IMO.
Per the OP this is pretty pricey (for APAT) at potentially £112.50 + raked pots. The dynamic feels very "gambly".
I (well we) were priced out of Manchester by the increased buy-in at both ME and side event. The APAT direction is all pretty worrying.
I appreciate that new ideas are always good but alas we"ll be watching with interest from the sidelines. GL.
ian.ski309:
As far as this forum goes I try to adopt the concept of "if you can"t say something nice then don"t say anything at all"... but I must depart from the norm here and say that I hate this as I suspect that it will only appeal to a minority of APATers.
I understand and applaud the notion of APAT constantly seeking to improve and raise the bar, but I think this is innovation for innovation"s sake. No offence intended, just my tuppence worth.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version