Poker Forum > General Discussion
APAT Wikipedia Entry
Delboy:
Shouldn"t you have included runners up.... ;)
Fatcatstu:
--- Quote from: PHIL_TC on February 03, 2012, 11:35:34 AM ---
--- Quote from: Des on February 03, 2012, 11:31:52 AM ---
Excellent job Paulie, looks really great. Thanks for your efforts.
--- End quote ---
Yip looks great, good job Paulie... only thing wrong is that you have Stuart Ward only winning something in 2009.
The way he still bangs on about it, it must have been 2009. 2010, 2011, 2012 and probably all the events in 2012 x
--- End quote ---
jealousy is something we champions have to deal with all the time, Phil. Luckily im the better person so i will rise above it.
Paulie_D:
OK...fixed the Abbreviation issue.
Apparently, it"s not the done thing to include Abbreviations in article titles.
Soooo....I added a "redirect" page that will take you straight to the main page if you search for the term "APAT" instead of "Amateur Poker Association & Tour.
Works the same way as WSOP....their main page is "World Series of Poker" not "World Series of Poker (WSOP)".
Right, I"m off to get some ointment for the postule I just found. ;D
MintTrav:
Well done Paulie - super job.
camking:
--- Quote from: Paulie_D on February 03, 2012, 10:56:03 AM ---
--- Quote from: Jon MW on February 03, 2012, 10:50:37 AM ---
Quick look - it needs some work on hyperlinks; a fuller look might follow
--- End quote ---
I know some of the hyper links don"t work yet WCOAP & Cash Tour for instance.
I"d check anything specific you might want to add with Des first....just to be nice.
--- End quote ---
It"s a nice start and should fill out nicely over time. Of course, you don"t need to make all the changes yourself, because it"s a wiki, so everybody can chip in to help (although people actually employed by APAT ought not to, I suppose?)
I think you"re going to need some citations to independent publications to backup the membership numbers and the "largest organisation" claims and things like that, though, otherwise they"ll be classified as unverifiable, original research. The tables of results don"t need those, though, imho. I"ve inserted the founding news article citation into the first sentence, but I"m too tired to search for others right now, sorry :o (closest thing in the standard smiley set to a yawn)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version