Poker Forum > General Discussion
DTD's new policy on deals
Sef:
--- Quote from: SirPercival on February 06, 2012, 17:41:15 PM ---
I think a better option is to have a "must leave £xx for winner" policy.
The host still gets the final table played to the end and the players have the option of reducing the variance.
--- End quote ---
Not a big fan of deals myself, would rather play it out for all or nothing (well whatever the nxt payout is :)) The money matters to me, of course it does but i don"t buy into a tournament to play for hours then ***** out with a last minute deal, I wanna then win and reap the benefits and bragging rights.
That said if there was a deal to be done then i think the above idea would probably please most.
Des:
Deals are lik taking a train to the next town and getting out 200 yards from the station because "you"re close". Once you"ve got your buyin and expenses back, you"re up. Play for the win, it"s a game.
Santino67:
I prefer to play for the win and hate the idea that often someone ends up being alienated at a table becuase they don"t want to deal. Can anyone else think of a game/sport/leisure pursuit which could lead a result of somebody "kinda" winning?
Honeybadg:
As a headline decision it is great - but how are they going to police the private deals that will be done?
Are they going to stop people taking stakes in each other - that is a deal.
L
ronaldo07:
I hate it when the entire FT chops. Win or FTFO
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version