Poker Forum > Live Poker
William Hill English Amateur Poker Championship
AJDUK:
--- Quote from: kinboshi on February 27, 2012, 13:05:27 PM ---
Just checking - tonight"s satellite is a £20 buy-in to try and win a seat in a £75 comp?
Doesn"t sound too inviting really. The £10 and £5 rebuy make sense, but not really a £22+2.
--- End quote ---
AMRN has made the same observation on another thread. Perhaps if the £20 is dropped to £15 (in future) the others are OK as they are?
At the moment though I"m worried we"re gonna have a different sponsor for every live event, requiring even more poker accounts because as far as I can see the only event WH is definitely sponsoring is the first one?
Chipaccrual:
--- Quote from: AJDUK on February 27, 2012, 15:46:26 PM ---
--- Quote from: kinboshi on February 27, 2012, 13:05:27 PM ---
Just checking - tonight"s satellite is a £20 buy-in to try and win a seat in a £75 comp?
Doesn"t sound too inviting really. The £10 and £5 rebuy make sense, but not really a £22+2.
--- End quote ---
AMRN has made the same observation on another thread. Perhaps if the £20 is dropped to £15 (in future) the others are OK as they are?
At the moment though I"m worried we"re gonna have a different sponsor for every live event, requiring even more poker accounts because as far as I can see the only event WH is definitely sponsoring is the first one?
--- End quote ---
That would appear to be a fair assumption to make. I"ve reduced my play down to just a few sites, but needs must (Although the schedule has not been favourable to me getting to many, if any of the live events). Sites like new players and appear happy to fund if they get sign ups. I guess it"s just the way of the world.
Paulie_D:
--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on February 27, 2012, 16:09:05 PM ---
--- Quote from: AJDUK on February 27, 2012, 15:46:26 PM ---
--- Quote from: kinboshi on February 27, 2012, 13:05:27 PM ---
Just checking - tonight"s satellite is a £20 buy-in to try and win a seat in a £75 comp?
Doesn"t sound too inviting really. The £10 and £5 rebuy make sense, but not really a £22+2.
--- End quote ---
AMRN has made the same observation on another thread. Perhaps if the £20 is dropped to £15 (in future) the others are OK as they are?
At the moment though I"m worried we"re gonna have a different sponsor for every live event, requiring even more poker accounts because as far as I can see the only event WH is definitely sponsoring is the first one?
--- End quote ---
That would appear to be a fair assumption to make. I"ve reduced my play down to just a few sites, but needs must (Although the schedule has not been favourable to me getting to many, if any of the live events). Sites like new players and appear happy to fund if they get sign ups. I guess it"s just the way of the world.
--- End quote ---
Agreed...although it probably doesn"t take a huge leap to guess at a "sponsor" for a couple of events scheduled. although I could be wrong....it"s been known.
AJDUK:
--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on February 27, 2012, 16:09:05 PM ---
--- Quote from: AJDUK on February 27, 2012, 15:46:26 PM ---
--- Quote from: kinboshi on February 27, 2012, 13:05:27 PM ---
Just checking - tonight"s satellite is a £20 buy-in to try and win a seat in a £75 comp?
Doesn"t sound too inviting really. The £10 and £5 rebuy make sense, but not really a £22+2.
--- End quote ---
AMRN has made the same observation on another thread. Perhaps if the £20 is dropped to £15 (in future) the others are OK as they are?
At the moment though I"m worried we"re gonna have a different sponsor for every live event, requiring even more poker accounts because as far as I can see the only event WH is definitely sponsoring is the first one?
--- End quote ---
That would appear to be a fair assumption to make. I"ve reduced my play down to just a few sites, but needs must (Although the schedule has not been favourable to me getting to many, if any of the live events). Sites like new players and appear happy to fund if they get sign ups. I guess it"s just the way of the world.
--- End quote ---
So APAT dies when we"ve exhausted all the different sponsors? Doesn"t sound like a brilliant long term plan, plus people (us) might get fed up of all the moving around. I hope I"m totally wrong with this fear.
Chipaccrual:
--- Quote from: AJDUK on February 27, 2012, 16:49:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on February 27, 2012, 16:09:05 PM ---
--- Quote from: AJDUK on February 27, 2012, 15:46:26 PM ---
--- Quote from: kinboshi on February 27, 2012, 13:05:27 PM ---
Just checking - tonight"s satellite is a £20 buy-in to try and win a seat in a £75 comp?
Doesn"t sound too inviting really. The £10 and £5 rebuy make sense, but not really a £22+2.
--- End quote ---
AMRN has made the same observation on another thread. Perhaps if the £20 is dropped to £15 (in future) the others are OK as they are?
At the moment though I"m worried we"re gonna have a different sponsor for every live event, requiring even more poker accounts because as far as I can see the only event WH is definitely sponsoring is the first one?
--- End quote ---
That would appear to be a fair assumption to make. I"ve reduced my play down to just a few sites, but needs must (Although the schedule has not been favourable to me getting to many, if any of the live events). Sites like new players and appear happy to fund if they get sign ups. I guess it"s just the way of the world.
--- End quote ---
So APAT dies when we"ve exhausted all the different sponsors? Doesn"t sound like a brilliant long term plan, plus people (us) might get fed up of all the moving around. I hope I"m totally wrong with this fear.
--- End quote ---
A bit of an extreme comment, but I know where you are coming from.
I"m sure Des and Tighty know exactly what they are doing. APAT is quite experienced when it comes to poker tours and deals. ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version