Poker Forum > National Online League

amalgamations!!

<< < (5/7) > >>

Chipaccrual:
This thread does make me chuckle.

We could just play North v South and have done with it.  I can understand the sentiment of wanting a level playing fiield for the teams, but I think now that it has gone to regions, the areas are big enough that it is going to come down to which teams spread the word and recuit players. (Which is never a bad thing)

I also had to laugh at Tighty"s stats.  All those that commented about me "throwing toys out of the pram" about which team you could play for will see that I"ve chosen a much smaller populated area than either the South West or South East that I could have shown allegiance to.

I must be mad, or maybe it wasn"t all about the winning.   ;)

Ironside:
come on scotland

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNLyZ17imyM[/youtube]

SirPercival:
Scotland may have the biggest team so far but lets face it guys and gals - we have Ironside ffs

Swinebag:
well the general consensus is that there is no problem. This makes me happy. It was just a query based on the numbers.

Lets get it on

NWFTW!!

MintTrav:
I can"t see the relevance of population statistics to this, other than stating that the regions are broadly comparable in population size. The most relevant factor is the number of active APAT players (or potential players likely to brought in by current players) clustered in an area. Any area of 100,000? (prob a lot less) could support a team if the player concentration is right. Comparing the winning potential of such large areas on the basis that one has a population of Xm and another has 2Xm is completely spurious.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page