Poker Forum > National Online League
Match Structure
WYoung83:
Yeh fair enough, can never please everyone. debate has been fun though.
galo5767:
--- Quote from: Des on March 11, 2012, 20:21:20 PM ---
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on March 11, 2012, 20:13:35 PM ---
Des,
What the hope for Week 1?
Would be good to get some feedback from Stars too, on what they think about the numbers
--- End quote ---
I believed we would get a record turnout Waz, but not 547 runners.
Perhaps not for PokerStars, but for every other major online operator in the UK, that would be an extremely good result. For a non operator to be able to produce those numbers, is exceptional.
--- End quote ---
If its an extremely good result, why on earth would you want to change it
galo5767:
--- Quote from: TightEnd on March 24, 2012, 18:31:19 PM ---
Answering points above
Week 3 is exactly the same as Week 2, and it is anticipated that will continue
No blind levels were missing Week 2 versus Week 1
Brian, for every player happy with Week 1, there was one unhappy at how long it went on. The European team also probably folds if we continued with the Week 1 structure, which would have been most undesirable not just for the legaue but for APAT in general, looking ahead.
It"s impossible to please everyone on this
--- End quote ---
I"m not entirely sure what APAT actually is, is it about the Forum or is it about the guys who play the tournaments? (genuine question). If its the latter, then I find the following statement hard to believe - 547 runners and "for everyone that was happy there was one unhappy", sorry, I do not question your integrity at all but this is a rash statement with no facts to back it up. It seems to me that APAT does indeed like to listen to its members, depending on what member you are. Having said that, if APAT is indeed about the guys who post on this forum then please
ignore this post.
BOINGBLITZ:
Didnt play last night but how many runners were there?
Was it more than 547 or less?
....and it if it was a lot less, how delighted are the sponsors??
Also, if there really were as many happy as there were unhappy with the opening structure, why was it changed at all then???
AJDUK:
--- Quote from: BOINGBLITZ on March 26, 2012, 06:57:41 AM ---
Didnt play last night but how many runners were there?
Was it more than 547 or less?
....and it if it was a lot less, how delighted are the sponsors??
Also, if there really were as many happy as there were unhappy with the opening structure, why was it changed at all then???
--- End quote ---
Because the captains, of which you are one, wanted it. Des has responded to everyone that has asked that APAT were happy to leave it as was but it was pressure from the captains that brought about the change.
Whether the captains wanted such a drastic change seems less clear cut, but you should at least be able to read the relevant thread on your private board to find out!
It appears that only pressure from the captains will lead to any (further) change.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version