Poker Forum > National Online League
Important query regarding Week 8
Des:
--- Quote from: SwissToni on April 30, 2012, 19:44:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: Des on April 30, 2012, 19:42:52 PM ---
--- Quote from: SwissToni on April 30, 2012, 19:37:12 PM ---
Even though you are in Team Scotland you can see quite how poor the rule is though?
Also that rule says nothing whatsoever about other players being moved up. Technically.
--- End quote ---
Henry - I believe it"s quite normal for any contestant to be bumped up in position should another get disqualified. Your feedback is good, however I wouldn"t dilute it by pushing too hard!
--- End quote ---
Lol good feedback can"t be diluted. It stands on its own merit :)
--- End quote ---
Technically ;)
Des:
--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on April 30, 2012, 19:44:23 PM ---
Just to clarify, the way the rule has been interpreted is the way it was meant when it was first written last season.
However, neither I nor any of the organisers had ever looked at it from the angle that Henry has, and to be honest, it does make a difference to the dynamic of the game around the points levels.
Impossible to change the rules halfway through, but one that I would hope would be looked at before the next league.
--- End quote ---
Personally, this is my view also.
MintTrav:
As opinions have been requested, my view is that it is an entirely sensible rule. Interlopers are ignored and points are allocated to the highest-finishing 27 players who belong to teams. This is how it has been for several seasons and makes total sense to me. Suppose 12 non-registered players finished in the top 27 - should only 15 players receive points? It"s not hard to imagine the complaints if outsiders caused a team to lose crucial points in the last game of the season. I can"t see that keeping a standard number of points-scorers causes a problem, but I can see it being an issue if non-registered players were allowed to disrupt the game to the extent proposed.
josharp01:
Just noticed player in 26th, Crisasharp, is noted as unregiestered. Defo should be EoE, registered before start of season (And is the Captain"s hubby!!)
Des:
--- Quote from: josharp01 on April 30, 2012, 22:52:56 PM ---
Just noticed player in 26th, Crisasharp, is noted as unregiestered. Defo should be EoE, registered before start of season (And is the Captain"s hubby!!)
--- End quote ---
Thanks for letting us know Jo - I will ask Ian to update the match result with hubby"s score included!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version