Poker Forum > Staker Exchange
APAT Staking Exchange - Discussion
RioRodent:
From "Staker Licensed Player - Application" thread...
"5 ) Applying to become a Licensed Player demonstrates your acceptance to pay APAT a £10 license fee (whether your application proves successful or not) plus an additional 1% commission on the value of any winnings enjoyed by your Stakers."
I have to say that I think the idea keeping someone"s £10 after refusing them a "license" is a bit rich... but then I disagree with charging in the first place.
Edit: And, and if I wanted to be pedantic I would point out that if the £10 is payable whether you subsequently are granted a license or not.. then it is really an "application fee" not a "license fee". ::)
Des:
--- Quote from: RioRodent on June 13, 2012, 22:10:57 PM ---
From "Staker Licensed Player - Application" thread...
"5 ) Applying to become a Licensed Player demonstrates your acceptance to pay APAT a £10 license fee (whether your application proves successful or not) plus an additional 1% commission on the value of any winnings enjoyed by your Stakers."
I have to say that I think the idea keeping someone"s £10 after refusing them a "license" is a bit rich... but then I disagree with charging in the first place.
--- End quote ---
It"s less about the £10 and more about trying to ensure we don"t get a lot of requests from players who have just come to APAT for staking, without having any results behind them.
RioRodent:
--- Quote from: Des on June 13, 2012, 22:15:08 PM ---
--- Quote from: RioRodent on June 13, 2012, 22:10:57 PM ---
From "Staker Licensed Player - Application" thread...
"5 ) Applying to become a Licensed Player demonstrates your acceptance to pay APAT a £10 license fee (whether your application proves successful or not) plus an additional 1% commission on the value of any winnings enjoyed by your Stakers."
I have to say that I think the idea keeping someone"s £10 after refusing them a "license" is a bit rich... but then I disagree with charging in the first place.
--- End quote ---
It"s less about the £10 and more about trying to ensure we don"t get a lot of requests from players who have just come to APAT for staking, without having any results behind them.
--- End quote ---
Then return the £10 to unsuccessful applicants.
Gup9y:
I agree with Des. £10 fee is unfair but then I would not want APAT to become a place for players to be headhunted. I would not have a problem with a small percentage going to my National Team but not sure about it going to APAT.
Thoughts Des
Des:
--- Quote from: RioRodent on June 13, 2012, 22:16:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Des on June 13, 2012, 22:15:08 PM ---
--- Quote from: RioRodent on June 13, 2012, 22:10:57 PM ---
From "Staker Licensed Player - Application" thread...
"5 ) Applying to become a Licensed Player demonstrates your acceptance to pay APAT a £10 license fee (whether your application proves successful or not) plus an additional 1% commission on the value of any winnings enjoyed by your Stakers."
I have to say that I think the idea keeping someone"s £10 after refusing them a "license" is a bit rich... but then I disagree with charging in the first place.
--- End quote ---
It"s less about the £10 and more about trying to ensure we don"t get a lot of requests from players who have just come to APAT for staking, without having any results behind them.
--- End quote ---
Then return the £10 to unsuccessful applicants.
--- End quote ---
That defeats the purpose Alan. Enormously.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version