Poker Forum > Live Poker
Re-Entry or No Re-Entry, that is the question
AAroddersAA:
$EV, I have mentioned it a few times and said I don"t think I fully understand it, which is also the reason I mainly comment on cash hands although I have recently started entering discussions about tournaments although I don"t think I am close to as good on these. I would certainly only be considering cEV in the early stages and not $EV though. This could be wrong in very specific situation btw.
You can just enter another tournament though, you have still paid £163 to enter twice you have the same number of chips and have paid the same amount for them (I am obviously ignoring expense"s here). Also the reasons most people have given for not wanting re-entries (might get outdrawn etc) are in my opinion reason to have re-entries.
Meh we ain"t going to resolve it here, it needs to be discussed over a beer at DTD ldo.
--- Quote from: duke3016 on August 07, 2012, 18:11:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: AAroddersAA on August 07, 2012, 18:02:57 PM ---
.............It"s APAT and there is a bar.........In fact being out is sometimes too much fun......the bar is still there.
--- End quote ---
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
--- End quote ---
Yes Ger, this has been confirmed as being in a large part your doing :-)
Gup9y:
I fully understand that re entry is becoming the thing these days but APAT can remain unique here by not playing along for the following reasons:
1. It"s the title we all want first and foremost
2. It"s not similar to the professional circuit where the prize pool is the incentive
3. Makes for a better game as it"s win or lose - lose your chips and your out
Again these are my thoughts and although we will need to change with times, as longs as numbers grow (and I"m sure they will) there is no need to allow re entry.
Hope these comments don"t upset anyone.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version