Poker Forum > National Online League
The 2nd National Online League of Season 6
cundallini:
A
Starshine:
Option A is like the one we had on Stars yes?
Well I really did like the online knockout cup, but I think this should be kept more like an inbetween the big ones. It would be nice to have it again, but is time for the big one now from my view.
So normally I would go for A, as it is more likely getting more Players in, as well as far I can remember it had more prizes as well, so there been prizes for the winner and the runner up as well for the first 3 individual players, and I think this is what attracts more Players
My only Prob is even though I would like Option A more, I can not play then :"( unless it is allowed that European Players join any region of their choice. Which would really be nice, as well in this case would only be 12 teams I guess. And we aren"t this many that suddenly a region gets overflooded. So please make this possible should option A win as I really would like to play and not want to sit here and wait till I have moved next year
kohan:
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on September 11, 2012, 09:10:26 AM ---
Option A
Positive - Has the benefit of keeping the indenity of the clubs that have been around for several seasons, albeit some a slightly changed bounderies. League was competitive as ever
Negative - Remains the issue of smaller regions being put at a disadvantage still, players may lose interest/motivation
Option B
Positive - Keeps everyone involved, great format, with smaller teams being more manageable, good team spirits too.
Negative - Loses the regional focus, as most regions get split into 2 or 3 "mini teams" so may dilute the club mentality and as a result going forward, maybe hard to pick this up again, which would be a shame
--- End quote ---
how can option A be fair when teams have 3 times amount of players as other teams. the main reason the structure was changed for s6 was because certain teams had a huge advantage because of there team size, but what happened was scotland 107 players north west 94 south east 89 wales 82 north east 79 then 8 teams under 54/50/47/47/35/34/33/32
so definitly OPTION B for fair play
adilong1:
Option B for me!!
nosey-p:
Option B
You can still keep the regional teams but in a "Team A, Team B" that does not mean your best players are in A then B and so on. Keep it to 6 players with 4 scoring, this giving you the option of not having the pressure of playing each week. This will make it a more competitive league as they will not be any domineering team in terms of numbers. Reduce the buy-in to $5, after the first 3 or 4 games players will start to drop off unless they have some points making it $5 may mean they stay around longer. Possibly have a different game something like have 2 NLH then a Omaha then 2 NLH then Stud. The disadvantage is that when the league gets going, they will be no room for new players to join unless some teams have 4 or 5 players.
If you have teams of 6 then the prize should be for 6 no matter how many points they have individual scored (It"s a team game)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version