Poker Forum > Online Poker
Scottish Online Series
Chipaccrual:
--- Quote from: HOLDorFOLD on October 18, 2012, 09:42:56 AM ---
--- Quote from: MintTrav on October 18, 2012, 00:42:54 AM ---
Gonna throw a spanner in now - seven nights in a row for these series is pretty heavy going. I think it would be better if there were fewer games or some gaps in between. Loving the Hi-Lo, Stud & Heads-Up. Maybe the Six-Max and the Rebuy could be dropped.
--- End quote ---
Agree, i love all the games but it is heavy going time commitment wise.
Alternatively, keep all games and have just top four counting for POTS scores?
--- End quote ---
Only top 5 scores count (8 events in total), although you get a guaranteed point for playing, which isn"t capped.
HOLDorFOLD:
--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on October 18, 2012, 12:18:02 PM ---
--- Quote from: HOLDorFOLD on October 18, 2012, 09:42:56 AM ---
--- Quote from: MintTrav on October 18, 2012, 00:42:54 AM ---
Gonna throw a spanner in now - seven nights in a row for these series is pretty heavy going. I think it would be better if there were fewer games or some gaps in between. Loving the Hi-Lo, Stud & Heads-Up. Maybe the Six-Max and the Rebuy could be dropped.
--- End quote ---
Agree, i love all the games but it is heavy going time commitment wise.
Alternatively, keep all games and have just top four counting for POTS scores?
--- End quote ---
Only top 5 scores count (8 events in total), although you get a guaranteed point for playing, which isn"t capped.
--- End quote ---
Yes I know. Most hardcore will try and play at least 5 events out of the eight ... still time consuming in one week when there"s homework to help with and dinners to cook (especially when you get in at 7pm from work with a 7pm kick-off).
If all events were kept but only the top 4 count (just dropping it by one), then that helps during the week whilst still giving everyone a good chance to qualify for the awesome extra added value that POTS gives ;D
I love these online champ games, the variety is great and would hate to lose any of the Side Events ... just putting it out there that maybe dropping to 4 top scores qualify may help ease the pressure a bit for those who have week night commitments ... plus still keeping most people in the running for the leaderboard throughout the week.
galo5767:
--- Quote from: MintTrav on October 18, 2012, 00:42:54 AM ---
Gonna throw a spanner in now - seven nights in a row for these series is pretty heavy going. I think it would be better if there were fewer games or some gaps in between. Loving the Hi-Lo, Stud & Heads-Up. Maybe the Six-Max and the Rebuy could be dropped.
--- End quote ---
I think whatever the schedule is - it will never suit everyone. ( i.e I don"t finish work till 10pm Tues & Weds)
Changing things in the future may be good for some but it would hinder others.
HOLDorFOLD:
--- Quote from: galo5767 on October 18, 2012, 13:50:01 PM ---
--- Quote from: MintTrav on October 18, 2012, 00:42:54 AM ---
Gonna throw a spanner in now - seven nights in a row for these series is pretty heavy going. I think it would be better if there were fewer games or some gaps in between. Loving the Hi-Lo, Stud & Heads-Up. Maybe the Six-Max and the Rebuy could be dropped.
--- End quote ---
I think whatever the schedule is - it will never suit everyone. ( i.e I don"t finish work till 10pm Tues & Weds)
Changing things in the future may be good for some but it would hinder others.
--- End quote ---
Which is why keeping the schedule and side events exactly as it is but dropping the amount of top qualifying results to 4 (instead of 5) will hinder no-one but would benefit more :-)
Matt D:
--- Quote from: Divitts. on October 18, 2012, 07:21:47 AM ---
--- Quote from: galo5767 on October 18, 2012, 00:27:34 AM ---
Is there a POTS leaderboard?
--- End quote ---
Was wondering this too ???
--- End quote ---
Scroll up for answer :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version