Poker Forum > APAT Online
APAT Bunch Of Fives
Waz1892:
A big disapointment for those up the top and a chance to get into the Top 2, that it never made the minimum runners.
I should think it feels like a "waste" of getting good results in the other games.
not sure if this can be avoided for future events if they are not supported as it seems at present.
For what it is worth, a think too many, "bespoke" varients put people off just imo.
MintTrav:
Missed the start by one minute too. I was gonna play to increase the numbers cos otherwise it can be difficult for anyone to dislodge the current leaders (I haven"t checked the league - don"t know who is currently leading it).
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on November 16, 2012, 19:59:54 PM ---
"bespoke" varients put people off
--- End quote ---
I"m not sure that is true, judging by the number who have posted that they were going to play.
NellieG:
--- Quote from: MintTrav on November 16, 2012, 20:00:27 PM ---
Missed the start by one minute too. I was gonna play to increase the numbers cos otherwise it can be difficult for anyone to dislodge the current leaders (I haven"t checked the league - don"t know who is currently leading it).
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on November 16, 2012, 19:59:54 PM ---
"bespoke" varients put people off
--- End quote ---
I"m not sure that is true, judging by the number who have posted that they were going to play.
--- End quote ---
To be honest, I would of thought the other games would give people (like me) to learn in a fun way amongst friends and support APAT.
Waz1892:
--- Quote from: MintTrav on November 16, 2012, 20:00:27 PM ---
Missed the start by one minute too. I was gonna play to increase the numbers cos otherwise it can be difficult for anyone to dislodge the current leaders (I haven"t checked the league - don"t know who is currently leading it).
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on November 16, 2012, 19:59:54 PM ---
"bespoke" varients put people off
--- End quote ---
I"m not sure that is true, judging by the number who have posted that they were going to play.
--- End quote ---
I was meaning more overall, but i accept quite a few others would have played having just missed the late reg cut off.
Which agree would have made a difference to the leaderboard.
Outlander:
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on November 16, 2012, 19:59:54 PM ---
A big disapointment for those up the top and a chance to get into the Top 2, that it never made the minimum runners.
I should think it feels like a "waste" of getting good results in the other games.
not sure if this can be avoided for future events if they are not supported as it seems at present.
For what it is worth, a think too many, "bespoke" varients put people off just imo.
--- End quote ---
Have enjoyed the other variants and would have registered tonight... prob for me not the variants but the 7pm start.. late reg was good but it"s a let down for everyone when the last event counts for nothing... but dont think that"s due to variants.. having only really played hold"m and omaha before it"s nice to give the others a go in a league situation where it"s low expense with something to play for... anyway congats to Cyntaf.. think he"s this week"s winner... but I"m certain Paul would have rather had a game tonight in which others had a chance to take top spot off him than see no-one have a chance to beat him coz of poor last event.. he"d probably still have finished top because he has been the most consistent so far but I"m sure Frank and Rob and the rest of us near the top were looking forward to the challenge of trying to beat him... late reg was advertised... dont see why low numbers need to affect that... lots of people had intended to play and probably would have been close to 20 players by the end of late reg... had it been in effect
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version