Poker Forum > Live Poker

Cash Tour - Finalised Format for Leg 3 - UKCOAP, Nottingham

<< < (2/8) > >>

MarkTheShark:
p.s. Thanks (again) for the edit Paulie....theres always 1, no matter how many times i proof read it before posting!!!

Paulie_D:

--- Quote from: MarkTheShark on August 14, 2013, 12:23:47 PM ---
I guess its only the same if two players end up with the same chip stacks for the cutoff position(s) - which is the only position it materially affects.
--- End quote ---


Sorry...I must be missing something.

This would seem to say that it"s based on stack size. Even though they have made the same % profit, one has made more cash than the other which is fine if that"s the way you are going...


--- Quote from: MarkTheShark on August 14, 2013, 12:23:47 PM ---
In this instance I would rule that both would qualify for the FT as an exceptional circumstance, unless one wished to not play the FT of course.

--- End quote ---


This would seem to indicate that it"s not based on stack size as they have made the same % profit.

MarkTheShark:

--- Quote from: Paulie_D on August 14, 2013, 12:34:30 PM ---

--- Quote from: MarkTheShark on August 14, 2013, 12:23:47 PM ---
I guess its only the same if two players end up with the same chip stacks for the cutoff position(s) - which is the only position it materially affects.
--- End quote ---


Sorry...I must be missing something.

This would seem to say that it"s based on stack size. Even though they have made the same % profit, one has made more cash than the other which is fine if that"s the way you are going...


--- Quote from: MarkTheShark on August 14, 2013, 12:23:47 PM ---
In this instance I would rule that both would qualify for the FT as an exceptional circumstance, unless one wished to not play the FT of course.

--- End quote ---


This would seem to indicate that it"s not based on stack size as they have made the same % profit.

--- End quote ---


previous Legs have been "biggest stacks" that progress to the FT - participating and interested players have suggested that "most profit" is a fairer method - especially for Phase 1.

Your example or query of two equal profitable stacks but for differing amounts is only the same as if i had two players playing Leg 1 or 2 who finished up with the same stack sizes at the end of Phase 1 - say 2 players finished on £275 - who would qualify then.

I have said that for Leg 3 it will be profit - not stack size - so if there are 2 equal come the end of Phase 1, and these are the ones that decide the Final FT player, then i would rule both would qualify - which i would have done in Legs 1 and 2 where it was stack sizes not profit.

Paulie_D:
Cool.

Thanks for that...it"s much clearer to me now.

MintTrav:
I assumed Mark would say £100 profit > £50, so I"m a bit surprised by the answer.

Surely profit is measured in £? Percentage profit seems a precarious route to take. If someone doubles £50 to £100, where does that leave someone who starts on £200?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version