Poker Forum > Strategy
Blind v Blind Easy Call, Easy Fold ?
mporter123:
http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/fulltiltpoker/Snos/poker/ratings/0A3BE411A0544EF3B6F33A61427F018F.html?t=3
Calling against this guy.
Folding against anyone that doesn"t have a clue. Expect ranges to tighten up significantly on the bubble, given the fact we cover, definitely folding against dem fishes. Nits gonna nit though.
Erimus:
It wasn"t a snap call from me, and running the numbers was getting 1.19/1 so needed 46% was getting slightly less so it was a -ev call, if he only has 10 bigs then it"s an easy snap.
As Mark has pointed out with the stats from opr he seems to know what he is doing so his range could be a lot wider.
I do prefer to be the shover rather than the caller in theses situations but I liked the look of having 50 bigs at that stage.
Eventually ran AQ into AK and didn"t cash.
Swinebag:
Against a 15 BB stack I"m min raising to induce a light shove as a vast majority will do this as this is a profitable play for them.
I"d say the plan worked so call, you are crushing his range here. As JMW said , I would need a solid read to fold and am calling against unknowns
ignore this post, misread HH.
AMRN:
Reluctant fold for me, unless we have a specific note on the SB to know that he shoves near 100% when folded to him in the SB.
Swinebag:
Lol. completely misread HH. Think this is much closer now. Shoving close to 100% is a profitable play from the SB so read less I tend to still favour the call. I think either option is ok though but calling is more fun.
Unlike Steve, I would want to see this guy fold his SB in this spot a few times to convince me to fold
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version