Poker Forum > General Online Poker Discussion
Double or Nothing SNGs.....
Swinebag:
finished the 100...see blog!
TopPair2Pair:
Good stuff swine, had a read and decided to give one a crack.
Anyway I cant really comprehend why ppl would play full ring instead of 6 seated if the buyins are the same!?!?!?!?!!?
AMRN:
--- Quote from: Toppietwo on October 19, 2008, 22:57:50 PM ---
Anyway I cant really comprehend why ppl would play full ring instead of 6 seated if the buyins are the same!?!?!?!?!!?
--- End quote ---
cos in a full ring game you can sit tight and wait for donks to make mistakes.... in a short handed game where you are in the blinds 33% of the time, you have to play more poker. Put simply, the full ring games are just easier.
Roscopiko:
--- Quote from: AMRN on October 20, 2008, 15:49:28 PM ---
cos in a full ring game you can sit tight and wait for donks to make mistakes.... in a short handed game where you are in the blinds 33% of the time, you have to play more poker. Put simply, the full ring games are just easier.
--- End quote ---
Totally agree, full ring the chances are that you will get 3/10 absolute no clue player who go in the first couple of levels and 6 handed you are going to need to survive so many more times in push and fold stages.
Donkbox:
Both nine and six seaters pay the same % of entrants and in simplistic terms the nine seaters may be better as you can play more tables and they may be populated by worse players and game selection plays less of a role. But, I think that a decent stt player has a bigger edge in 6max precisely because of the reason AMRN states - players are in the blinds 33% of the time - meaning they"re forced into playing more hands and playing flops against players worse than you is good.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version