Poker Forum > Strategy
stop n go or shove?
bigredders:
why would you fold here? unless you are waiting for aces?
shove all the way here, the problem with a stop n go here is you may be letting your opponent catch up, whereas u could win the pot pre-flop
not only that, if you were losing pre-flop, there are a very limited number of hands that would fold to your stop and go, therefore might as well shove pre
undisputed:
--- Quote from: bigredders on July 06, 2009, 23:34:31 PM ---
why would you fold here? unless you are waiting for aces?
shove all the way here, the problem with a stop n go here is you may be letting your opponent catch up, whereas u could win the pot pre-flop
not only that, if you were losing pre-flop, there are a very limited number of hands that would fold to your stop and go, therefore might as well shove pre
--- End quote ---
I"d just fold and wait 4 a big hand :D :D :D :D :D :D
deanp27:
default in a vacuum is shove
but if UTG is positionally aware and capable (depends also on his stack size) it may lead to a different conclusion.
in poker you need reads tho
Marty719:
Folding isnt awful depending on what type of player utg is. If he is a tight player then we insta fold wen he brings it in utg. We have to assign a range and act upon it. Really we have to ask what range our oponent is raising w/ from tht position and how much of it we are beating/racing with. It is def a fold/shove hand. Just player dependant as with a lot of the game!
AMRN:
rarely folding, but don"t think it"s always an auto-shove.... surely there is sometimes merit in using "stop and go" here.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version