Poker Forum > Strategy

Small pairs, utg and in mid possition

<< < (3/3)

deanp27:
depends but i"d do anything but limp

fraac:
You want to get all-in against overcards + dead money. Either limping or standard raising, whichever looks more vulnerable to a good player in position at your table.

duke3016:
Annette link was there now its gone -- however it has Chezger flaws == all in any position any pair - job done

Marty719:

--- Quote from: fraac on August 09, 2009, 16:38:40 PM ---
You want to get all-in against overcards + dead money. Either limping or standard raising, whichever looks more vulnerable to a good player in position at your table.

--- End quote ---


We dnt want a multi-way pot with 77 tho.  I think limping is pure spewage.  Also, I think if u r under 10bb"s then there is way more value is just picking up the blinds.  Ur still gng to get called by most of the hands that r gng to raise if u limp (unless they r bad enuff to think u r limp folding ur

lukybugur:
I removed link - it was dodgy as the page contained a banner for BetFair - bad Neilly (self-slap)

Set mining is one thing, yes you can limp with low / medium pocket pairs hoping to take down a big pot when you hit / feel you can represent a bigger hand but only if you are able to fold if you don"t hit / don"t feel like you can represent on Flop.

So close to the bubble in an MTT, I wouldn"t shove low PPs as, if you"re called (by a bigger stack will mean you"re playing for your tourney life), you"re 52%/48% at best. Not worth it IMO.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page