Poker Forum > Strategy
AA lay down
LongshanksED:
with the matasow. It looked like the mouth of old an was getting outdrawn and badbeated left right and centre
I"m sure the guy only had one spade (the ace) but it was only the river. Tough laydown by mike and I don"t think I couldve did it at that stage. When he bluffed to win a pot after being beaten down all day was good though
evilpie:
--- Quote from: HaworthBantam on August 26, 2009, 19:30:54 PM ---
I"ve laid down AA on two occasions - both times to 4 all ins (stupid wild games) after I"d raised.
Both times I would have lost - once to trip Q"s and the second to a straight.
Like has already been said, it depends on the situation.....
--- End quote ---
No offence intended but if you fold AA here you really shouldn"t be playing stupid wild games.
The reason to play stupid wild games is so that you can get loads of money in the middle with the best hand.
You get it and then you pass.
Durrrrrr......
pables:
Durrrrrr...... would call obviously!
Is that what you meant? :)
evilpie:
--- Quote from: pables on August 27, 2009, 11:35:38 AM ---
Durrrrrr...... would call obviously!
Is that what you meant? :)
--- End quote ---
I deliberately put in a few extra rrrrrr"s to avoid confusion :)
But yes I"m sure he would.
sopranoltd:
--- Quote from: evilpie on August 27, 2009, 11:52:10 AM ---
--- Quote from: pables on August 27, 2009, 11:35:38 AM ---
Durrrrrr...... would call obviously!
Is that what you meant? :)
--- End quote ---
I deliberately put in a few extra rrrrrr"s to avoid confusion :)
But yes I"m sure he would.
--- End quote ---
Tom Dwan ( durrrr ) would of called that with J-Q suited if he had implied odds ...... He did it once and he"d do it again .
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version