Poker Forum > WCOAP 2008 - 2012

APAT WCofAP at DTD

<< < (9/10) > >>

Marty719:
Yea I think  I shuda pressed a bit harder.  It was def 10 9 2 6 2 so was a 100% split.  Just didnt want to badger on as I figured if the guy who lost the pot wasnt complaining about it, it wasnt my place.  

Jon MW:

--- Quote from: Marty719 on September 03, 2009, 11:24:23 AM ---
Yea I think  I shuda pressed a bit harder.  It was def 10 9 2 6 2 so was a 100% split.  Just didnt want to badger on as I figured if the guy who lost the pot wasnt complaining about it, it wasnt my place. 

--- End quote ---


If the player who should have won half the pot was easy to read, or if the player who got awarded the whole pot was particularly good - then I"d definitely bring it up and get it redistributed. :)

kinboshi:

--- Quote from: Marty719 on September 03, 2009, 11:24:23 AM ---
Yea I think  I shuda pressed a bit harder.  It was def 10 9 2 6 2 so was a 100% split.  Just didnt want to badger on as I figured if the guy who lost the pot wasnt complaining about it, it wasnt my place. 

--- End quote ---


It affects everyone though in a tournament doesn"t it?

Even in a cash game I speak up here, even though it arguably doesn"t matter to anyone else except those involved.

Hammerite:
There is cctv on all tables so this dispute would have been easily sorted if the player wronged had wanted to persue it.

deanp27:

--- Quote from: Hammerite on September 03, 2009, 17:09:48 PM ---
There is cctv on all tables so this dispute would have been easily sorted if the player wronged had wanted to persue it.

--- End quote ---


i doubt they would stop the tournament for so long to check a ruling on CCTV.

Only time i have seen CCTV used was after break in the £330 when a guy came back and claimed half his stack disappeared during the break.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version