Poker Forum > Strategy

What is the correct ruling here ?

(1/2) > >>

ck1888:
This situation caused quite a stir at the local casino on tuesday night and i would be interested to hear the thoughts of you guys on this.

Blinds are 100/200. UG+1 calls, cut off raises to 600, SB calls, BB calls then the dealer deals the flop !!!

Then the SB leads for 1200 at which point the BB calls the floor for a ruling as obviously the UG+1 never called the raise.

The BB and the raiser had quite different ideas as how to continue from here.

Opinions please...

AMRN:
interesting one - not sure what the "correct" line is.

Personally, I would wind the hand back to the preflop position and ask the UTG+1 to call/fold/raise. The cards dealt on the flop would be put back in the pack and the pack shuffled.

Paulie_D:
The flop needs to be redealt. The boardcards are mixed with the remainder of the deck. The burncard remains on the table. After shuffling, the dealer cuts the deck and deals a new flop without burning a card.

Before all that the UTG+1 gets to complete his action.

It"s all in RROP somewhere.

Swinebag:

--- Quote from: Paulie_D on February 25, 2010, 22:36:39 PM ---
The flop needs to be redealt. The boardcards are mixed with the remainder of the deck. The burncard remains on the table. After shuffling, the dealer cuts the deck and deals a new flop without burning a card.

Before all that the UTG+1 gets to complete his action.

It"s all in RROP somewhere.

--- End quote ---


shouldn"t the turn and river be dealt face down first (with their respective burn cards) before the deck is reshuffled?

Paulie_D:
Not that I"m aware of. No reason too as they flop will be different to the first (barring a major miracle). No need for the turn and river to be dealt until the new flop is in place.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page