Poker Forum > Strategy
What did I do wrong here?
CrizzyConnor:
--- Quote from: MintTrav on February 28, 2010, 00:53:25 AM ---
Do you remember Carlarge was on our table when you got it AIPF for your life with 65 against my AK even though I had 3-bet you the other night? He probably remembered you.
--- End quote ---
You still whining about that?! It was suuuiiittteeed ffs :D
And you never 3-bet me you re-raised my cut-off raise from the BB and I 3-bet you all in.
Maybe he did remember me from there but there"s a definite difference between 3-betting all in pre-flop 17/18bbs deep and raising, C-betting, 3-betting then all in on turn IMO. Anyone can spazz out all in pre-flop but it takes a right idiot to keep spazzing out like I did in this hand without having 72os beat :-\
CrizzyConnor:
--- Quote from: WYoung83 on February 28, 2010, 01:00:21 AM ---
Raise was way to small pre flop with antes up for grabs and position for the BB. from the looks at first hes not playing his hand, he is playing the situation imo....he hits 2nd pair and repops your c bet to find out if you have an over pair or jack. You basically said you have a hand at this point and i cant justify his play after you have basically pot commited yourself. they say that you want to play vs these type of players, but when somthing like this happens it hurts like hell and leaves you scratching you head.
--- End quote ---
Yeah that was my thinking, the call pre is marginal at best but that doesn"t matter. The re-raise on flop is totally fine to ask the question but when I answered with the 3-bet it should"ve been done and dusted there IMO. The fact my 3-bet wasn"t massive either should"ve been seen as a sign of strength too, or so I thought when I made the bet. Onwards and upwards I suppose. I won $100 in a $10 HU tourney I wouldn"t have played has I still been in this so I guess it"s alright :D
MintTrav:
--- Quote from: CrizzyConnor on February 28, 2010, 01:04:34 AM ---
--- Quote from: MintTrav on February 28, 2010, 00:53:25 AM ---
Do you remember Carlarge was on our table when you got it AIPF for your life with 65 against my AK even though I had 3-bet you the other night? He probably remembered you.
--- End quote ---
You still whining about that?! It was suuuiiittteeed ffs :D
And you never 3-bet me you re-raised my cut-off raise from the BB and I 3-bet you all in.
Maybe he did remember me from there but there"s a definite difference between 3-betting all in pre-flop 17/18bbs deep and raising, C-betting, 3-betting then all in on turn IMO. Anyone can spazz out all in pre-flop but it takes a right idiot to keep spazzing out like I did in this hand without having 72os beat :-\
--- End quote ---
Lol, yeah making the bet without the goods is much preferable to calling without them. And it was my decision not to take the lower-risk option in a satellite. AK is hardly a cast-iron winner. It might be a good hand to have them all in with in a top-heavy structure, but it"s not necessary to make the PF call in a multi-seat satellite. Also I suppose you did me a favour cos whichever of us won the hand was virtually guaranteed a £75 seat and I was certain I was well ahead. So good luck to you, I"ve put it down to variance. 56s is the nuts. :D
Suggest you Google three-betting though - yours was a four-bet.
CrizzyConnor:
--- Quote from: MintTrav on February 28, 2010, 02:00:22 AM ---
--- Quote from: CrizzyConnor on February 28, 2010, 01:04:34 AM ---
--- Quote from: MintTrav on February 28, 2010, 00:53:25 AM ---
Do you remember Carlarge was on our table when you got it AIPF for your life with 65 against my AK even though I had 3-bet you the other night? He probably remembered you.
--- End quote ---
You still whining about that?! It was suuuiiittteeed ffs :D
And you never 3-bet me you re-raised my cut-off raise from the BB and I 3-bet you all in.
Maybe he did remember me from there but there"s a definite difference between 3-betting all in pre-flop 17/18bbs deep and raising, C-betting, 3-betting then all in on turn IMO. Anyone can spazz out all in pre-flop but it takes a right idiot to keep spazzing out like I did in this hand without having 72os beat :-\
--- End quote ---
Lol, yeah making the bet without the goods is much preferable to calling without them. And it was my decision not to take the lower-risk option in a satellite. AK is hardly a cast-iron winner. It might be a good hand to have them all in with in a top-heavy structure, but it"s not necessary to make the PF call in a multi-seat satellite. Also I suppose you did me a favour cos whichever of us won the hand was virtually guaranteed a £75 seat and I was certain I was well ahead. So good luck to you, I"ve put it down to variance. 56s is the nuts. :D
Suggest you Google three-betting though - yours was a four-bet.
--- End quote ---
Pot was unopened when I raised so my raise = 1st bet
your re-raise = 2nd bet
my re-raise = 3-bet .... no?
or do we count the blinds as a bet pre-flop?
I can"t be bothered looking it up :D
hi_am_chris:
If it was pre flop then after you open the re raise is the 3 bet
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version