Poker Forum > Strategy
theory - how would you play it?
Paulie_D:
--- Quote from: TheSnapper on July 24, 2010, 13:24:56 PM ---
if the pot gets big, its because he wants it that way.
--- End quote ---
Possibly and you are probably correct..and yet we have no information on this villain..is he donk, station or a pro?
This is why I question the value of this particular thread...what point is noble1 trying to make.
There is just so little information on which to base the "proper" decision and without that we can argue all day without coming to a "decision".
In the end it comes down to a person"s style of play...what might seem spewy to some would seem insightful to others. I don"t claim to have the final answer and anyone who does is...just...wrong because the only answer in poker is, as we all know..."It Depends".
--- Quote from: TheSnapper on July 24, 2010, 13:24:56 PM ---
--- Quote from: Paulie_D ---
I want to represent more strength than I actually have.
--- End quote ---
representing more strength than I actually have = Bluff
--- End quote ---
Yep...and yet I might still be ahead.
noble1:
i"m not making a point Paulie, just giving u a hand to disect with no reads or level/stakes info etc and hoping u guys discuss different concepts when villain is agg or tricky etc etc...
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/69/micro-stakes-pl-nl/theory-looong-how-beat-micros-2nl-50nl-367707/
i took this from a post made about value betting , of course in poker there is more to it with reads especially but i thought this post was well thought out.. [QT from example 3]
In fact its probably better than any book i know of as a way to explain value betting , anyone else know of any?
When WYoung83 mentioned the check raise turn it reminded me of Neil Channings turn check raise in the big game shown a few days ago versus Sam Trickett , does any1 think Neil should bluff river? luvved the 200 bet lol lol , would be interesting if Sam had raised river and Neil shoved lol , now that would be one sicko move :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSpxtinR0Xk
hand in question is about 7+1/2 mins in , personally i like to see non std moves , but does anyone check flop 2pair here?
Maybe he thought viffer would cbet? meh messy hand in the end...
Paulie_D:
I get it but your premise is based on micro-stakes and without stack sizes.
At micro-stakes ANYTHING is possible....which changes the hand/play dynamic completely and that, IMO, weakens any argument..especially mine. ;D
Are we value betting here, bluffing or just trying for showdown? TBH...I"m leaning towards the latter but I think that we can maximise any FE by betting again.
Horses for courses, I suppose and as I said, it depends...after all, it"s not as though there is a "right" answer..just one that works..or not.
Marty719:
Pretty sure b/f is really bad otr against good players.
Checking back flop is better w/ history to induce so we can c/c c/c but still not terrible to pot control
Stack sizes are very important to river action...but c/f isnt as bad as a lot of people think w/ no history.
Topstarclub:
Thank you :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version