Poker Forum > General Discussion

Sharkscope...

(1/3) > >>

hi_am_chris:
Anybody else managed to sneak into any of their leaderboards?

GiMac:
Tbh I don"t rate Sharkscope, it"s too easy to block and is imho very inaccurate. For instance it has me as playing 15 tournies on Stars in the last 2 years losing approx $300, lol.

I prefer officialpokerrankings.com which work on true results direct from the sites themselves, although they can"t take into account final table deals.

The Codd:
Sharkscope only shows stt"s (I"m pretty sure) whereas OPR is only mtts with 45 or more people in it.

Completely different.

kinboshi:
Remember that the 180-seater SNGs on PokerStars do show on Sharkscope.  It"s not just STTs that show, it"s SNGs (and these can be MTTs).

Jon MW:

--- Quote from: The Codd on November 19, 2007, 11:53:38 AM ---
Sharkscope only shows stt"s (I"m pretty sure) whereas OPR is only mtts with 45 or more people in it.

Completely different.

--- End quote ---


And OPR doesn"t show private tournaments - for example The Hendon Mob league games. I don"t think Sharkscope picks up every Sit and go either.

Basically I think these sites will only work if they included all the data - as they don"t then I don"t think you can get a realistic reading from them.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page