Poker Forum > Strategy

<< < (2/4) > >>

samuel_9:

--- Quote from: WYoung83 on January 19, 2011, 19:40:11 PM ---
seems to be a typo either on flop or turn? was it 3 clubs on flop?

no im sorry, u put the turn in wrong place.....lol, so basically 44 has a boat, well he cant fold can he.

--- End quote ---
i thimk hes drunk

Fatcatstu:
confused here dave mate. i dont know what other hands are involved but even the stokton rock couldnt find a fold here.

on flop i think a 8 bet into 14 at that casino is never enough.

pokerpops:
I"m not fully involved in the hand other than having put £8 in on the flop with middle-pair and a mini-flush draw

The interesting issue for the table was that the lad with the house folded...
Cut-off showed the  ac :3c:
BB  kc qc

As the table universally questioned the fold the dealer burnt and turned the river card....  jc

I was curious as to how many people could make that fold


PS Stu, £8 into £14 folds out a lot of 9s and 4s where the villain has no club and it gets a poor value call from those with a single club. It rarely gets raised by less than 2-pair, sets or made flushes

Marty719:

--- Quote from: david3103 on January 20, 2011, 08:56:26 AM ---
I was curious as to how many people could make that fold

--- End quote ---


Obv results don"t matter in hands like these.  Making this fold would be incorrect, even if villain has 10"s full in the actual hand.  It never matters what they have.  All that matters is the range of hands they are capable of having, and our hands equity vs that range.  44 obv crushes vs their range...

As it happens, 44 would have managed to get it in vs 1 out once...hopefully not many people "could make that fold" and if they did, it would be an error.

samuel_9:
never never folding a house

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version