Poker Forum > Rankings Archive

APAT Rankings Discussion

<< < (12/16) > >>

Jon MW:

--- Quote from: Bodddders on May 03, 2008, 09:41:29 AM ---
... Tbh I believe Des and Jon would be the first to say that the Rankings for this season have not been updated as they would have envisaged. ...

--- End quote ---


I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave some moments ago


--- Quote from: Jon MW on May 02, 2008, 09:20:31 AM ---
...


--- End quote ---


and, I think


--- Quote from: Bodddders on May 03, 2008, 09:41:29 AM ---
We are all aware what a great job all the volunteers at APAT do but that doesn"t mean that if something isn"t right we are not allowed to point it out.
...

--- End quote ---


is better than


--- Quote from: AMRN on May 03, 2008, 07:39:12 AM ---
... and I don"t think there is ANY room at all for criticism. ...

--- End quote ---


There is always room for criticism because no system is perfect.

But that does mean it will still not be perfect after we address any single criticism. So there will never be an opportunity for everything to work exactly as every member would like it to.

Although you might want to be careful around Des - he gets a bit tetchy  
It"s a bit like when someone asks whether it"s his round.   ;)

CJ:
Although parts of my original post seemed critical, it wasn"t meant in that way! As a very competitive person, it"s just frustating not knowing how well you are doing in a series and also nice to be able to highlight the players that are doing well in the series so you can either avoid getting involved in a hand with them or push them all in with 72os to try and frustrate them and get lucky!!!!!!

I fully understand why the points are not regularly updated, but was only really asking if there was anyway that they could be! purely because I feel that any new members/players may be put off playing by something as important as this! It has definately made me think twice about continuining within the APAT series both online and regional, because whether or not there are problems obtaining results it should in theory be easy enough to rectify! After all, it is in Blue Squares interests to make these results available on a more regular basis as it will, in my opinion make the APAT Tour more inviting to new and current players.

coprey:
I can understand frustration regarding non update of ranking points. I am awaiting points from 24th April.

I have been lucky enough to make a few on-line final tables this season and have noticed other members observing the action and in many cases posting updates in the forum.

How would APAT feel about APAT members posting the top 9 results on the forum, which could be used to update a provisional ranking table and then be confirmed by Blue Sq at a later date?

Chipaccrual:

--- Quote from: coprey on May 21, 2008, 15:23:30 PM ---
I can understand frustration regarding non update of ranking points. I am awaiting points from 24th April.

I have been lucky enough to make a few on-line final tables this season and have noticed other members observing the action and in many cases posting updates in the forum.

How would APAT feel about APAT members posting the top 9 results on the forum, which could be used to update a provisional ranking table and then be confirmed by Blue Sq at a later date?

--- End quote ---


Not a bad suggestion.  Have to see what Des and Jon think of it.

tumblet:

--- Quote from: coprey on May 21, 2008, 15:23:30 PM ---
I can understand frustration regarding non update of ranking points. I am awaiting points from 24th April.

I have been lucky enough to make a few on-line final tables this season and have noticed other members observing the action and in many cases posting updates in the forum.

How would APAT feel about APAT members posting the top 9 results on the forum, which could be used to update a provisional ranking table and then be confirmed by Blue Sq at a later date?

--- End quote ---


Its a great suggestion, I made this a while ago, along with the same idea for the regionals..

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version