Poker Forum > General Online Poker Discussion
APAT Bunch Of Fives Leaderboards on 888poker
mporter123:
I think adding a password would be counter-intuitive to the idea of these tournaments - Bring new players to APAT via the link to the site in the lobby and provide cheap tourneys for regulars to enjoy with added value.
I have no problem with having lots of new players involved but can understand why some do. I would say that these tournaments are far from crapshoots, stacks are always deep enough to play. I know what you mean that some of the non-regulars will go a bit crazy, fair share of those in all tournaments.
I would personally leave it as is.
Trademans:
--- Quote from: duke3016 on April 26, 2011, 21:35:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: Trademans on April 26, 2011, 21:32:52 PM ---
--- Quote from: duke3016 on April 26, 2011, 20:32:27 PM ---
story of the weekend continues - all in ahead in a race - come out the end losing - gg tho enjoyed it
--- End quote ---
sorry ger... Lucked out on ya.... :-)
--- End quote ---
np Llyr - cuurently smashing the 1c 2c PLO -- LOL
--- End quote ---
what table? might come and donate...
duke3016:
Kwangju
Quasar:
--- Quote from: mporter123 on April 26, 2011, 21:44:48 PM ---
I think adding a password would be counter-intuitive to the idea of these tournaments - Bring new players to APAT via the link to the site in the lobby and provide cheap tourneys for regulars to enjoy with added value.
I have no problem with having lots of new players involved but can understand why some do. I would say that these tournaments are far from crapshoots, stacks are always deep enough to play. I know what you mean that some of the non-regulars will go a bit crazy, fair share of those in all tournaments.
I would personally leave it as is.
--- End quote ---
The issue is not "having a problem with having lots of new players involved" Mark. My personal issue is that this is a league type event, structured over 5 games, which totally changes the dynamics of each game and therefore if people want to play in it they should be apat members.
NellieG:
I cannot see the problem myself, if non APATers play this, surely they cannot be listed in the weekly tables, therefore, the points a non APATer would earn would not be counted, and the points they get would go to the next APATer.
I am not sure if I have explained this eloquently enough.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version