Poker Forum > General Discussion

Season 6 Discussion

<< < (61/142) > >>

1TRW1:
APAT rankings - should they be proportional to the size of the field?

Is it right that the winner of the live WCOAP Main Event has to go through 400 players and gets 18 points, and the winner of an online NLH event has to go through say 60 players and gets 18 points as well?

This isn"t sour grapes on my part, quite the opposite - I benefited from this this year winning the World Online where the field from memory was only around 70 players.

Foggy:
Very good point

I would like to put forward the the majors, carry more points than the online series

Swinebag:

--- Quote from: Foggy on January 15, 2012, 20:34:59 PM ---
Very good point

I would like to put forward the the majors, carry more points than the online series

--- End quote ---


not so much live over online but number of runners

there should be a sliding scale - say top 10% get points starting from 1 to whatever..

so 59 runner event like last night - top 6 get points, 1 for 6th up to 6 for winning
414 runner event like WCOAP - top 41 get points, 1 for 41st up to 41 for the bink.

I certainly have benefited from the points system this year, as did all the people in season 2 who won live regionals that got 10 runners

AJDUK:
Would prefer to see it back to seperate online rankings and live rankings. The two are very different and I was surprised when they were merged for this last season. Plus, not everybody plays both.

Swinebag:
though rankings are pointless if there isn"t any added value for the winner

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page