Poker Forum > General Discussion

Season 6 Discussion

<< < (68/142) > >>

Chipaccrual:

--- Quote from: Fatcatstu on January 21, 2012, 08:43:59 AM ---

--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on January 21, 2012, 06:56:07 AM ---
Enough discussion, are we there yet ?

This is so tilting being out of the loop, it is unreal.

--- End quote ---


theres an easy solution to that one isnt there...

--- End quote ---


The Terms & Conditions would be far too complicated I think.   ;)

SirPercival:

--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on January 21, 2012, 09:52:40 AM ---

--- Quote from: Fatcatstu on January 21, 2012, 08:43:59 AM ---

--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on January 21, 2012, 06:56:07 AM ---
Enough discussion, are we there yet ?

This is so tilting being out of the loop, it is unreal.

--- End quote ---


theres an easy solution to that one isnt there...

--- End quote ---


The Terms & Conditions would be far too complicated I think.   ;)

--- End quote ---


and that"s before you even talk to Des and co.

RioRodent:

--- Quote from: Chipaccrual on January 16, 2012, 10:35:22 AM ---
WCOAP Main Event winner (based on 400 runners) = 40x2 = 80pts
National Event winner (based on 150 runners) = 15x2 = 30pts
Online Main Event Winner (based on 80 runners) = 8x1.5 = 12pts
Online League Matchday Winner (based on 120 runners) = 12x.5 = 6pts

--- End quote ---


How about using the Pocket 5"s ranking formula? I haven"t read up on how it has evolved, but I"m sure better, more analytical minds than mine were involved! If you need to know the thinking behind it, look here - http://www.pocketfives.com/leaderboard-formula-faq

The calculator itself and the formula can be found here - http://www.pocketfives.com/plb-calculator/

It would provide the following range of points, based on;

- The field size / buy-in examples above
- Points only awarded to ITM places (10% of field used for each example)
- £1 live = $1 online (since £ for £ the standard online is generally higher, this seems a reasonable exchange rate?)

Runners/Buy-In1st PlaceLast ITM place400 @ £10020021.87150 @ £75106.0720.8980 @ $5063.2518.6120 @ $1034.647.8


Never been one to re-invent the wheel.

Jon MW:

--- Quote from: George2Loose on January 20, 2012, 00:41:09 AM ---
...

A way of countering this is to have participation points for each event and perhaps having a points booster say after every 10 events. This will reward those loyal to APAT

--- End quote ---


Participation points are a very good way of encouraging play - but a very bad way of measuring skill.

I had a thought about national ranking points for league games though.

Instead of points per game - which would horribly skew the rankings to favour online players

The final league table could be awarded national ranking points - as if it"s an additional national championship.

18 points down to 1 for the top 18 in the league:
     (i)   obviously a legitimate measure of skill
     (ii)  encourages extra participation in the league
     (iii)  but doesn"t excessively distort the rankings against the players who don"t play the league

2 leagues per season = 2 extra sets of National Championship ranking points to fight for

AceOnTheRiver:
Season 5 is Over, Does that mean we can have an anouncement about Season 6?

Can we?

Please?

Are we there yet?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version