Poker Forum > General Discussion
Season 6 Discussion
TightEnd:
TheHitman.23:
London Venue ??
TightEnd:
--- Quote from: TheHitman.23 on January 27, 2012, 13:02:03 PM ---
London Venue ??
--- End quote ---
Have been to the Vic before, do Luton most years which is 40 minutes away
Nothing against a London venue, apart from the expenses being dearer for most people
mporter123:
Option 1 would be my preference in the short term as it is low risk.
I can see that in the long run - option 3 is the most likely revenue generating option. I would have thought that the competencies required for running and organising a tour are very different to those needed for running a successful online poker room.
I do think that with some more marketing every APAT event could be a 3 day"er - not sure if this is the desired direction though. I see no reason why APAT does not charge a reg fee in the current climate. Introducing a reg fee is not likely to alienate the vast majority of members as it is just the norm in poker tournaments. Also not having a reg fee is not enough of an incentive to make someone choose to play an APAT tournament over another tournament. If we can prove that a 10% reg fee would not decrease numbers with a test event then I think it should be introduced.
Its the difference between £1K per event that can go into the budget for other things like growing the player base. Plus it creates a nice virtuous circle as your total rake increases as the player base increases.
Desi:
I would happily pay a reg fee, and Im sure the majority would agree to this.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version