Poker Forum > General Discussion
Season 6 Discussion
Paulie_D:
Oops...sorry Des.
Didn"t realise.
abdoman:
Has incorporation of a reg fee by reducing the buy-in been considered? For example, £70+5, which would retain the "magical" £75 total cost to play (which is nicely pitched). I guess that some might see this as a tax on the winners as the prize pool will be slightly reduced, but thought I"d throw it out there.
mylesfdo:
--- Quote from: Paulie_D on February 22, 2012, 16:02:27 PM ---
Oops...sorry Des.
Didn"t realise.
--- End quote ---
+1 sorry
pokerpops:
Js
--- Quote from: abdoman on February 22, 2012, 16:12:36 PM ---
Has incorporation of a reg fee by reducing the buy-in been considered? For example, £70+5, which would retain the "magical" £75 total cost to play (which is nicely pitched). I guess that some might see this as a tax on the winners as the prize pool will be slightly reduced, but thought I"d throw it out there.
--- End quote ---
This
Seriously, reg fee up to £10 on £75 is reasonable for a dealer dealt tournament with the structure APAT gives us
abdoman:
I never claimed that £75+10 was unreasonable, I just thought I"d suggest an alternative. That said, I think £75 (total cost) is a well pitched product, offering a step up from £30 & £50 tournaments that are commonplace, but still cheaper than the £100 tournaments that deter some folk.
I"ve only played one APAT event so far (but intend to play more) so my opinion might not reflect the mood of seasoned APATers, but I thought an option that eliminated the creep towards £100 might appeal to some. I"m happy to pay £70+5, £75+10 or even £90+10.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version