Amateur Poker Association & Tour
Poker Forum => General Discussion => Topic started by: Scousebill on May 11, 2012, 12:24:03 PM
-
I know this has probably been talked about before but....
Do you find much more players seem to stay in until the river and tend to hit it....
I was playing a 4max comp today and the amount of "come from behind wins" seemed ridiculous..
I suppose it is likely to be the low stakes - $4 entry that encourages players to stay in longer.
Do people who play higher stakes games $50+ see the same trends or do players tend to play properly?
-
Happens all the time. Stars is obviously to blame, as proven by their marquee pro winning 2 SCOOP events.
Its hard to put a serious response but I can assure you that there are bad players at all levels and getting rivered is certainly not uncommon, whatever site you play on or whether you play live
-
This post isn"t just solely about me getting rivered but the view that a lot of hands I have seen have been won on the River lately..
Obviously for me personally I need to bet heavier before the River to try to get them out of the hand...
-
Obviously for me personally I need to bet heavier before the River to try to get them out of the hand...
if you"re ahead, why do you want to get them out of the hand? So long as you are charging the wrong price for them to chase their draws, then let them play badly - variance says they will get there once in a while, but that"s just poker.
-
I was playing on Stars last night and witnessed a proper blowup by some guy from Switzerland kicking off for a good 5 minutes saying the site was rigged and that "always the same get good cards then when near the money nothing etc" "the only winners are the PokerStars mafia" etc.. needless to say he was losing.
Then when he got knocked out of the tourny went on an another massive capital letter style rant to the guy who had knocked him out which went on for another good 5 mins... at the end of the guy who knocked him out just replied with "gg"... ;D
Always the same Bill... you always remember the times you get rivered or 1, 2 outed etc... but never remember the times when you get lucky yourself or river someone else, all swings and roundabouts mate x
-
well recently I have been getting turned/rivered constantly with 2 and 3 outers so I decided to start counting the wins/losses with them when all in pre.... last 19 times it"s been in pre with AA v 88 or such PP hands I have held up once....... last 13 times when it"s been AK/AQ v AJ/KQ type hands i have held up twice. So 2 outered 18/19 times and 3 outered 11/13 now although I"m sure we would all agree that it"s not much of a sample size it"s sickening nonetheless. This is all on pokerstars aswell so take from it what you will :)
-
last 19 times it"s been in pre with AA v 88 or such PP hands I have held up once....... last 13 times when it"s been AK/AQ v AJ/KQ type hands i have held up twice.
Screenshot?
-
Didn"t bother with screenshots as I just kept count for my own wonderment.
-
I"ve only been reg"d with Stars since week 1 of the online league and have to say I"m already sick sick sick, despite finishing 4th in the 1st online league. I don"t play every day multi tabling, 6 hours a day, probably more in the region of about 12 hours a week with only 1 or 2 tables usually. In that short time, and for the 5th time last night, I have lost after flopping a FH. I would never suggest for a minute that anything is rigged against me (why would it be), but I have no qualms whatsoever at suggesting that the cards dealt are nowhere near as random as it"s suggested. The large numbers of AA all in pre I"ve lost with is just horrible, way too often again (IMO) to be random (just a few posted on my blog, as well as one that went in my favour).
Those of you who know me well realise I"m the type to take beats and move on to the next hand/game. I"m struggling badly though to continue taking outdraw after outdraw, numerous runner runners, and again AA hammerings when you"re meant to be 4/1+ favourite. I"m completely unable to build my bankroll since my initial cash in week 1 and steadily feeling more & more demoralised getting smacked about the head. Last nights 88 v 10/7os on 8/4/4 flop may be my final straw, though I will continue with the first stage of the league at least.
-
Sorry guys but I have to laugh at all the hints and suggestion about Pokerstars being rigged, or the cards being non-random. In a world of lawsuits resulting in scrutiny to the lowest level of detail, do we really think that the largest online provider in the world, with a turnover in the billions, would risk losing it all for the sake of rigging the RNG to have an impact in micro stakes games, to favour house players??
-
(http://www.thepeoplescube.com/images/captions/Tinfoil_Hat_Cat.jpg)
-
Last nights 88 v 10/7os on 8/4/4 flop may be my final straw
Please say it was 44 with the T kicker.
-
Santino...
You seem to support what I am saying about the strange number of river hits to win, it is odd that if you get beat by a higher pair it doesn"t seem to happen as much on the flop or 4th as it does on the river.
I think the only thing at fault is not the site but maybe my timing but it still doesn"t stop it being so annoying...
-
last 19 times it"s been in pre with AA v 88 or such PP hands I have held up once....... last 13 times when it"s been AK/AQ v AJ/KQ type hands i have held up twice.
Screenshot?
well done for not quitting
-
Santino...
You seem to support what I am saying about the strange number of river hits to win, it is odd that if you get beat by a higher pair it doesn"t seem to happen as much on the flop or 4th as it does on the river.
I think the only thing at fault is not the site but maybe my timing but it still doesn"t stop it being so annoying...
Seems to be way too many runner runners in my case, played 3 tourneys tonight, went out all 3 against runner runners. Top 2 pair v top pair then spade spade, Flopped Set of 5"s v A10 runner runner A-5 straight and can"t remember the other one. I"m never suggesting for a minute that anything"s fixed for or against any individual or group, but i am concerned that the cards aren"t as random as suggested.
*********** # 25 **************
PokerStars Hand #80347382490: Tournament #572010696, $2.50+$0.25 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2012/05/12 18:32:17 ET
Table "572010696 29" 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: SantinoAPAT (2937 in chips)
Seat 2: karividda (23400 in chips)
Seat 3: gvozdik777 (5700 in chips)
Seat 4: peiraias79 (6450 in chips)
Seat 5: amc platinum (4990 in chips)
Seat 6: devi83 (21337 in chips)
Seat 7: gimmea147 (7350 in chips)
Seat 8: TotalFett (3700 in chips)
Seat 9: Nallerbux (2650 in chips)
amc platinum: posts small blind 100
devi83: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to SantinoAPAT [5d 5c]
gimmea147: folds
TotalFett: folds
Nallerbux: raises 400 to 600
SantinoAPAT: raises 2337 to 2937 and is all-in
karividda: folds
gvozdik777: folds
peiraias79: folds
amc platinum: folds
devi83: folds
Nallerbux: calls 2050 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (287) returned to SantinoAPAT
*** FLOP *** [Qs 5s 3h]
*** TURN *** [Qs 5s 3h] [2c]
*** RIVER *** [Qs 5s 3h 2c] [4d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Nallerbux: shows [Th Ad] (a straight, Ace to Five)
SantinoAPAT: shows [5d 5c] (three of a kind, Fives)
-
Watchyagonnado??
-
Total tosh OP and some of the replies.
The last 4 LIVE final tables I"ve reached (excluding BCPC lol) I got AA once on each and been cracked each time. Sometimes the longshots come in. Sometimes they come in a few in a row. If you"ve ever tried FAV backing on the horses you"ll find that favourites never seem to come in!
Sure it sucks when it happens but it isn"t rigged. Some sites are luckier for some just like some underpants are lucky for others. Play where you feel better or luckier, but don"t blame the software, the dealers or anyone else but variance (or yourself).
-
I"ve only been reg"d with Stars since week 1 of the online league and have to say I"m already sick sick sick, despite finishing 4th in the 1st online league. .... In that short time, and for the 5th time last night, I have lost after flopping a FH. I would never suggest for a minute that anything is rigged against me (why would it be), but I have no qualms whatsoever at suggesting that the cards dealt are nowhere near as random as it"s suggested. The large numbers of AA all in pre I"ve lost with is just horrible, way too often again (IMO) to be random
...
As a point of comparison I"ve been reg"d with Stars for several years and played a couple of thousand tournaments - and in my experience sequences of bad luck and good luck even themselves out so you end up with an overall range of expected values.
...The large numbers of AA all in pre I"ve lost with is just horrible, way too often again (IMO) to be random
...
This in particular just highlights that a lot of people have got very little idea about what "random" looks like and the nature of "randomness".
-
Total tosh OP and some of the replies.
The last 4 LIVE final tables I"ve reached (excluding BCPC lol) I got AA once on each and been cracked each time. Sometimes the longshots come in. Sometimes they come in a few in a row. If you"ve ever tried FAV backing on the horses you"ll find that favourites never seem to come in!
Sure it sucks when it happens but it isn"t rigged. Some sites are luckier for some just like some underpants are lucky for others. Play where you feel better or luckier, but don"t blame the software, the dealers or anyone else but variance (or yourself).
I agree that Pokerstars is random and honest. Variance and bad beats are part of the game online, just as they are in casinos.
I don"t agree with the horse racing analogy though.
There are some right Bent B*stards paying to make sure the favorite doesn"t win ;D
-
My opinion fwiw is that pokerstars has probably the best card shuffled around and this includes live shufflers I never get outdrawn but I have seen some pretty sick stuff happen to others it is part of the game
-
My opinion fwiw is that pokerstars has probably the best card shuffled around and this includes live shufflers I never get outdrawn but I have seen some pretty sick stuff happen to others it is part of the game
Do I detect a tongue in cheek, or are you GOD
-
Do I detect a tongue in cheek, or are you GOD
Steve does not joke. He won the $3000 Pot-Limit Omaha WSOP (Event #26) last year holding the 2 of clubs, a joker, a scooby doo top trumps card "scrappy doo" and a monopoly community chest "go back to Old Kent Road" card.
-
Do I detect a tongue in cheek, or are you GOD
Steve does not joke. He won the $3000 Pot-Limit Omaha WSOP (Event #26) last year holding the 2 of clubs, a joker, a scooby doo top trumps card "scrappy doo" and a monopoly community chest "go back to Old Kent Road" card.
thanks Phil - just sprayed my pint all over my laptop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Do I detect a tongue in cheek, or are you GOD
Steve does not joke. He won the $3000 Pot-Limit Omaha WSOP (Event #26) last year holding the 2 of clubs, a joker, a scooby doo top trumps card "scrappy doo" and a monopoly community chest "go back to Old Kent Road" card.
How do I like this post?
-
Easy to win when scrappy doo and the joker are wild
Online poker rigged?
Of course it is, proof here
http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/
-
Easy to win when scrappy doo and the joker are wild
Online poker rigged?
Of course it is, proof here
http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/
LOL fantastic :D
-
(http://www.thepeoplescube.com/images/captions/Tinfoil_Hat_Cat.jpg)
What a great idea. Self protection. I seem to recall a young lad on Eastenders trying this. Mmm, come to think of it he didn"t turn out so good. Oh well just keep on taking the bad beats etc.....
LMAO at the picture.................Class!!
-
Easy to win when scrappy doo and the joker are wild
Online poker rigged?
Of course it is, proof here
http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/
LOL fantastic :D
+1 u is a funny guy Phil.
BTW Grant, a little suggestion for you my friend.
Take a few weeks off the poker, seems you may have other things on your mind. When you come back, all of those hands will be a thing of a very distant past. GL matey :)
-
My opinion fwiw is that pokerstars has probably the best card shuffled around and this includes live shufflers I never get outdrawn but I have seen some pretty sick stuff happen to others it is part of the game
Do I detect a tongue in cheek, or are you GOD
I may be god (as may you be at the same time) it would all depend on you perception but this is not the time or the place for that *lol*.
Sorry I made the last post on my phone on a train so it is not clear, to be honest I am a bit amazed we are even talking about this on this forum. Most of the big sites have good RNG"s but to the best of my understanding even the best of the best are not TOTALLY random but then again neither is somebody riffling a deck of cards, this is not an advantage to any one player of course. The Pokerstar"s RNG has been reported as one of the best around. I have played a lot on "Stars and it does not seem any more or less random than sites like Sky, DTD or live venues (if anything I would expect it to be better). I could tell you about bad runs I have had and good runs that I have had and they have more than less evened themselves out (actually I am sure I have run slightly above expected EV over my lifetime).
I would also say I respectfully disagree with comments above, some people are luckier on some sites than others. They are not, you can say they historically have been but this makes no difference to what will happen from this point onwards. Confidence may be affected of course so players who believe they are luckier on a certain site may actually play better on that site in which case playing there is correct but they are playing better not luckier.
Paul is right about taking a break sometimes. I have had to do so recently and it was only when I came back I realized how many simple mistakes I was making the bad luck feels worse when you are playing bad I find.
-
I can confirm, yes Pokerstars is rigged.
5 Handed in a SCOOP satellite. Top 2 get $215 seats, 3rd gets $70
Hand One
PokerStars Hand #80422749877: Tournament #557157933, $10+$1 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level X (400/800) - 2012/05/14 14:06:54 WET [2012/05/14 9:06:54 ET]
Table "557157933 1" 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: paulus777 (9023 in chips)
Seat 2: Chipaccrual (17596 in chips)
Seat 3: bartekowa (5580 in chips)
Seat 4: chuwanash (7833 in chips)
Seat 6: yor77 (14968 in chips)
paulus777: posts the ante 75
Chipaccrual: posts the ante 75
bartekowa: posts the ante 75
chuwanash: posts the ante 75
yor77: posts the ante 75
chuwanash: posts small blind 400
yor77: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Chipaccrual [9h 9d]
paulus777: folds
Chipaccrual: raises 2400 to 3200
bartekowa: raises 2305 to 5505 and is all-in
chuwanash: folds
yor77: folds
Chipaccrual: calls 2305
*** FLOP *** [8c 10s 5d]
*** TURN *** [8c 10s 5d] [6d]
*** RIVER *** [8c 10s 5d 6d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Chipaccrual: shows [9h 9d] (two pair, Tens and Nines)
bartekowa: shows [Kd Ad] (a flush, Ace high)
bartekowa collected 12585 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 12585 | Rake 0
Board [8c 10s 5d 6d 10d]
Seat 1: paulus777 folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 2: Chipaccrual showed [9h 9d] and lost with two pair, Tens and Nines
Seat 3: bartekowa (button) showed [Kd Ad] and won (12585) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 4: chuwanash (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: yor77 (big blind) folded before Flop
Very next hand
PokerStars Hand #80422782095: Tournament #557157933, $10+$1 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level X (400/800) - 2012/05/14 14:07:45 WET [2012/05/14 9:07:45 ET]
Table "557157933 1" 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: paulus777 (8948 in chips)
Seat 2: Chipaccrual (12016 in chips)
Seat 3: bartekowa (12585 in chips)
Seat 4: chuwanash (7358 in chips)
Seat 6: yor77 (14093 in chips)
paulus777: posts the ante 75
Chipaccrual: posts the ante 75
bartekowa: posts the ante 75
chuwanash: posts the ante 75
yor77: posts the ante 75
yor77: posts small blind 400
paulus777: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Chipaccrual [10h Ah]
Chipaccrual: raises 2400 to 3200
bartekowa: folds
chuwanash: raises 4083 to 7283 and is all-in
yor77: folds
paulus777: folds
Chipaccrual: calls 4083
*** FLOP *** [4s Kd 10s]
*** TURN *** [4s Kd 10s] [3s]
*** RIVER *** [4s Kd 10s 3s] [Js]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Chipaccrual: shows [10h Ah] (a pair of Tens)
chuwanash: shows [9s 9h] (a flush, Jack high)
chuwanash collected 16141 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 16141 | Rake 0
Board [4s Kd 10s 3s Js]
Seat 1: paulus777 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: Chipaccrual showed [10h Ah] and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 3: bartekowa folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 4: chuwanash (button) showed [9s 9h] and won (16141) with a flush, Jack high
Seat 6: yor77 (small blind) folded before Flop
From comfortable seat position to shortstack in two hands, runner runner flushed both times.
And out shortly after that >:(
Oh, and both players in the above hands won the seats. Surprised ? ;)
-
I can confirm, yes Pokerstars is rigged.
5 Handed in a SCOOP satellite. Top 2 get $215 seats, 3rd gets $70
From comfortable seat position to shortstack in two hands, runner runner flushed both times.
And out shortly after that >:(
Oh, and both players in the above hands won the seats. Surprised ? ;)
(http://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/37/b0a5fcf6968fb3cdc79bb84a89b4ac20/l.jpg)
-
On line poker definately rigged - saw the best hand hold up serveral times in last nights scoop.
Even my mighty 77 couldn"t crack the QQ & KK I had inadvertently shoved into from UTG.....
Might have helped if I hadn"t fallen asleep twice. At least I had the common sense to use the snooze feature on my phone. :)
Also if you win 3* the buy-in does this count as a min cash? I mean I"m new to all this and really - rigged RNG on Pokerstars.
Next up bots, exposed holecards on super accounts, multi accounting and collusion (although these all did/do actually happen).
Moving on......
-
Easy to win when scrappy doo and the joker are wild
Online poker rigged?
Of course it is, proof here
http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/
LOL fantastic :D
+1 u is a funny guy Phil.
BTW Grant, a little suggestion for you my friend.
Take a few weeks off the poker, seems you may have other things on your mind. When you come back, all of those hands will be a thing of a very distant past. GL matey :)
Good advice to take a break Paul, but I"m happy to keep going in the belief that the variance will work out. Like I said before I"m not suggesting anythings "rigged", nor am i suggesting that I"ve not at any time made bad plays. It"s just very painful joining a site then finding that approximately 80% of the hands I"m getting in with well ahead are leading to seriously awful outdraws. So yeah I"ll put it down to variance kicking me in the knackers for the most part and assume that it"ll iron itself out over the piece.
See you all on the virtual again at the weekend and at Cardiff on 26th ;)
-
Amazed that people honestly still believe this kind of thing. I"ve played on Stars for about the last 4 years now and had every single sick suckout imaginable. I"ve also dealt out some horrible beats to other players. It"s just the nature of the game. I hear rants in the chat box almost daily from players insisting it"s rigged but then I hear precisely the same playing on Sky (in fact more so). But the fact is I win money on both sites. And when you look up the players moaning about it being rigged on OPR or Sharkscope, surprise surprise, they"re generally losing players.
Bad beats happen. Simple as. You just have to learn to deal with them. I find the best way is to concentrate on your good beats rather than the bad and look at whether you would play the hand any different if you played it again.
You want (or should want) players making big mistakes and calling your shoves where you"re holding the best hand. If they suck out then so be it but if you played it right and you keep doing so then the results will come.
And this is coming from someone who has broken two mice and a monitor whilst playing so trust me I do know where you"re coming from, i"ve just learned to be a lot less Hellmuth over the years! :o))
-
Amazed that people honestly still believe this kind of thing. I"ve played on Stars for about the last 4 years now and had every single sick suckout imaginable. I"ve also dealt out some horrible beats to other players. It"s just the nature of the game. I hear rants in the chat box almost daily from players insisting it"s rigged but then I hear precisely the same playing on Sky (in fact more so). But the fact is I win money on both sites. And when you look up the players moaning about it being rigged on OPR or Sharkscope, surprise surprise, they"re generally losing players.
Bad beats happen. Simple as. You just have to learn to deal with them. I find the best way is to concentrate on your good beats rather than the bad and look at whether you would play the hand any different if you played it again.
You want (or should want) players making big mistakes and calling your shoves where you"re holding the best hand. If they suck out then so be it but if you played it right and you keep doing so then the results will come.
And this is coming from someone who has broken two mice and a monitor whilst playing so trust me I do know where you"re coming from, i"ve just learned to be a lot less Hellmuth over the years! :o))
Did you not read my post properly ?
It clearly is rigged, I have posted the evidence to prove it. ;)
And I really don"t think much of your blatant "I am a winning player" brag post ;D
-
Did you not read my post properly ?
It clearly is rigged, I have posted the evidence to prove it. ;)
And I really don"t think much of your blatant "I am a winning player" brag post ;D
Sorry Leigh. Having read your post I can now see it blatantly is rigged. In the first hand when the river is first dealt there are only 4 cards and you have the winning hand and yet when it goes to showdown another card has appeared that gives him the flush. Outrageous cheating!
My humble apologies. I"ve written an angry letter to Daniel Negreanu.
I reckon he"s my bestest mate now as I keep getting e-mails with personal recommendations about what SCOOP tournaments he recommends that are signed by him. Nice of him to take the time out of his busy schedule to look at what I play and make suggestions based on it.
I"ll let you know what he says.
-
I actually won a hand today were the River went in my favour.. I was ahead at the start and went behind then hit the River to stay a winner... :D
-
I actually won a hand today were the River went in my favour.. I was ahead at the start and went behind then hit the River to stay a winner... :D
FIX! :)
-
I actually won a hand today were the River went in my favour.. I was ahead at the start and went behind then hit the River to stay a winner... :D
Blatantly rigged imo!!
-
Watched the PCA highlights and saw Katchalot lose with AA v QQ AIPF. Don"t feel so bad now that i know even the big money live tourneys are fixed ;D
-
You think it"s bad when it happens in a small stakes tourney online, how"s about the World Series Final Table?!
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvpEv-gbbDE[/youtube]
-
Stars RNG is fun 2 Royal flushes in 5 hands at my table :D gotta love the guy flat calling my bet of quad Tens instead of moving me all in.. that was kind i reckon..
PokerStars Hand #80533015516: Omaha Hi/Lo No Limit ($0.10/$0.25 USD) - 2012/05/16 11:14:36 ET
Table "Eduarda III" 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: gun333106 ($19.02 in chips)
Seat 2: JIugep ($9.10 in chips)
Seat 3: xdolalzz ($11.15 in chips)
Seat 4: Olavius ($21.78 in chips)
Seat 5: Fandango ($14.46 in chips)
Seat 6: NonnieP ($24.15 in chips)
Fandango: posts small blind $0.10
NonnieP: posts big blind $0.25
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Fandango [2c 6h 7h 4h]
gun333106: folds
JIugep: calls $0.25
xdolalzz: folds
Olavius: calls $0.25
Fandango: calls $0.15
NonnieP: checks
*** FLOP *** [Qs Ks Jh]
Fandango: checks
NonnieP: checks
JIugep: checks
Olavius: bets $0.25
Fandango: folds
NonnieP: folds
JIugep: calls $0.25
*** TURN *** [Qs Ks Jh] [5c]
JIugep: checks
Olavius: bets $0.25
JIugep: calls $0.25
*** RIVER *** [Qs Ks Jh 5c] [Js]
JIugep: bets $0.75
Olavius: calls $0.75
*** SHOW DOWN ***
JIugep: shows [Ts 8d As Qh] (HI: a Royal Flush)
Olavius: mucks hand
JIugep collected $3.34 from pot
No low hand qualified
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $3.50 | Rake $0.16
Board [Qs Ks Jh 5c Js]
Seat 1: gun333106 folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 2: JIugep showed [Ts 8d As Qh] and won ($3.34) with HI: a Royal Flush
Seat 3: xdolalzz folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 4: Olavius (button) mucked [4s Ad Kc 2s]
Seat 5: Fandango (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 6: NonnieP (big blind) folded on the Flop
...
PokerStars Hand #80533154011: Omaha Hi/Lo No Limit ($0.10/$0.25 USD) - 2012/05/16 11:17:40 ET
Table "Eduarda III" 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: gun333106 ($19.94 in chips)
Seat 2: mje444 ($9.65 in chips)
Seat 3: xdolalzz ($10.90 in chips)
Seat 4: Olavius ($19.65 in chips)
Seat 5: Fandango ($13.83 in chips)
Seat 6: NonnieP ($24.40 in chips)
xdolalzz: posts small blind $0.10
Olavius: posts big blind $0.25
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Fandango [td Js Ad 7s]
Fandango: raises $0.25 to $0.50
NonnieP: folds
gun333106: calls $0.50
mje444: folds
xdolalzz: folds
Olavius: calls $0.25
*** FLOP *** [Th Ts Qh]
Olavius: checks
Fandango: bets $0.50
gun333106: calls $0.50
Olavius: folds
*** TURN *** [Th Ts Qh] [Kh]
Fandango: checks
gun333106: checks
*** RIVER *** [Th Ts Qh Kh] [Tc]
Fandango: checks
gun333106: bets $1
Fandango: raises $1.75 to $2.75
gun333106: calls $1.75
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Fandango: shows [td Js Ad 7s] (HI: four of a kind, Tens)
gun333106: shows [Ks Jh Ah Jc] (HI: a Royal Flush)
gun333106 collected $7.74 from pot
No low hand qualified
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $8.10 | Rake $0.36
Board [Th Ts Qh Kh Tc]
Seat 1: gun333106 showed [Ks Jh Ah Jc] and won ($7.74) with HI: a Royal Flush
Seat 2: mje444 (button) folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 3: xdolalzz (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Olavius (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 5: Fandango showed [td Js Ad 7s] and lost with HI: four of a kind, Tens
Seat 6: NonnieP folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
-
lol wtf?? flat calling on the end with a Royal? Minimising value!!
-
lol wtf?? flat calling on the end with a Royal? Minimising value!!
Obv scared I had five of a kind YAHTZEE !!!
-
:D Best missread ever, we should be greatful, not mocking :D :D
-
Just a taster of todays beats........ and trust me theres been plenty more like this!!
Table "Weringia II" 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Winter49 ($5.23 in chips)
Seat 2: AkAxaoc ($2.88 in chips)
Seat 3: oyoyoyoyoo ($4.64 in chips)
Seat 4: bigpaul011 ($6.74 in chips)
Seat 5: DrSteveHouse ($5.31 in chips)
Seat 6: snoopymdPS ($5.79 in chips)
Seat 7: PornoEis ($12.69 in chips)
Seat 8: K1x_Steve ($12.38 in chips)
Seat 9: beuybeuy ($4.93 in chips)
AkAxaoc: posts small blind $0.02
oyoyoyoyoo: posts big blind $0.05
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bigpaul011 [Kd Kh]
bigpaul011: raises $0.10 to $0.15
DrSteveHouse: folds
snoopymdPS: folds
PornoEis: folds
K1x_Steve: folds
beuybeuy: folds
Winter49: raises $0.22 to $0.37
AkAxaoc: folds
oyoyoyoyoo: folds
bigpaul011: raises $0.53 to $0.90
Winter49: raises $0.53 to $1.43
bigpaul011: raises $5.31 to $6.74 and is all-in
Winter49: calls $3.80 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($1.51) returned to bigpaul011
*** FLOP *** [9s Qh 5s]
*** TURN *** [9s Qh 5s] [9h]
*** RIVER *** [9s Qh 5s 9h] [Ac]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
bigpaul011: shows [Kd Kh] (two pair, Kings and Nines)
Winter49: shows [Qc Qs] (a full house, Queens full of Nines)
Winter49 collected $10.09 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $10.53 | Rake $0.44
Board [9s Qh 5s 9h Ac]
Seat 1: Winter49 (button) showed [Qc Qs] and won ($10.09) with a full house, Queens full of Nines
Seat 2: AkAxaoc (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: oyoyoyoyoo (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: bigpaul011 showed [Kd Kh] and lost with two pair, Kings and Nines
Seat 5: DrSteveHouse folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 6: snoopymdPS folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 7: PornoEis folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 8: K1x_Steve folded before Flop (didn"t bet)
Seat 9: beuybeuy folded before Flop (didn"t bet)