Poker Forum > National Online League
Match Structure
PHIL_TC:
lol at the turbo references.
I really can"t see the problem.
Needs to finish at 1am?
5k/12m. Simple isn"t it?
All this verbiage. Hurts my brain.
ps. I won"t be playing Sunday as its my birthday. Good luck everyone. I"ll be smashed and maybe briefly think of you all x
bear21:
--- Quote from: Santino67 on March 19, 2012, 21:32:32 PM ---
--- Quote from: TightEnd on March 19, 2012, 18:34:02 PM ---
One minor gripe, and by all means tell me this is not unusual
but it feels more turbo because many take so long to make action
When you have people timebanking in Levels 1-3 it was quite regularly that you"d get no more than 1-1.5 orbits per level
Timebanking I assume is people multi-tabling, making a cuppa etc
One hand was 5 bet pre-flop. Each raise went to timebank.
it played like molasses on my table
Act quicker=more hands=more opportunities
--- End quote ---
Can we fiddle with the timers Richard? I personally don"t think there"s that many situations where you need more than 15 seconds to act. When required I agree a timebank is useful but fully agree there was more used than needed. Some may use their timer to try tilt people, which is fair enough, but make it shorter and it should mean more hands per level for everyone.
--- End quote ---
+1
sitting and waiting for someone to play and then they fold after 60 seconds
very frustrating
Curlarge:
--- Quote from: PHIL_TC on March 19, 2012, 21:49:16 PM ---
lol at the turbo references.
I really can"t see the problem.
Needs to finish at 1am?
5k/12m. Simple isn"t it?
All this verbiage. Hurts my brain.
ps. I won"t be playing Sunday as its my birthday. Good luck everyone. I"ll be smashed and maybe briefly think of you all x
--- End quote ---
Blatant Birthday Brag obv., fishing for good wishes and presents, (preferably both) and can"t believe you didn"t post your address to ensure cards arrive on time. ;) ;) ;)
p.s. Happy Birthday {{{{{buddy}}}}}, card in post xx :-* :-*
gerry5421:
Sigh ,are we going to have weekly moan thread , as since this league began thats all I seem to read.
Structure in my not so expert opinion is fine , was happy enough with week 1 as I had a feeeling numbers would drop off, and the final table when formed was very even and yes i was railing till 3am , but also fine with week 2.
But now we are complaining about the timebank- what ??????
Guys I think we need to let this run a few weeks before demanding a re-think at least give it a chance to settle.
But I can seem that no matter what happens APAT can"t please everyone , an impossible task but thats life.
Guys its time to move on lets play this legue in the APAT spirit and see how it settles
Oh and come on the Scotland :P :P
BOINGBLITZ:
Gerry...I believe "Letting it run" shouldv"e applied for the initial structure for longer than 1 week don"t you think?
Also, could we have an official response to Richard"s quote that he was under the impression it would be changing to 5k/12 mins...or have I got that one wrong?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version