Poker Forum > Strategy

What would You Do ??????

<< < (8/9) > >>

TheSnapper:

--- Quote from: AAroddersAA on May 10, 2012, 16:30:54 PM ---
You don"t have to c-bet all flops but this one is a c-bet.

He has 99.

--- End quote ---


If he can have 99 he can have 55-JJ so shoving the turn is decently +EV

TheSnapper:

--- Quote from: deanp27 on May 10, 2012, 16:12:58 PM ---
3bet pre but no need to make £30 etc, I prefer a bit smaller even though it"s live cash as we are not super deep. You don"t have to CB 100% of flops as the preflop aggressor and I would check here but not necessarily fold.

Personally think calling pre here is a recipe for disaster

--- End quote ---


In this flop spot, if we check then OR checks and passive player bets, we are in a really tough spot and probably have to fold.

noble1:
not totally sold on the idea that villain will isolate 2 limpers 100% with small pairs :)

http://www.bluffmagazine.com/magazine/Wait,-Weight-Phil-Galfond-932.htm

AAroddersAA:

--- Quote from: noble1 on May 10, 2012, 17:11:35 PM ---
not totally sold on the idea that villain will isolate 2 limpers 100% with small pairs :)

http://www.bluffmagazine.com/magazine/Wait,-Weight-Phil-Galfond-932.htm

--- End quote ---

I will admit the hand did not get shown. That"s what he said he had later, I believe him.

AAroddersAA:

--- Quote from: TheSnapper on May 10, 2012, 16:59:47 PM ---

--- Quote from: AAroddersAA on May 10, 2012, 16:30:54 PM ---
You don"t have to c-bet all flops but this one is a c-bet.

He has 99.

--- End quote ---


If he can have 99 he can have 55-JJ so shoving the turn is decently +EV

--- End quote ---

Didn"t actually see the hand as he turned it into a bluff and shoved the turn after a check. I am pretty sure that"s what he had though. Just would not have put him on it at the time, wondered if anybody else could have.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version