Poker Forum > Live Poker

OnLive Discussion

<< < (12/28) > >>

GiMac:

--- Quote from: Foggy on November 05, 2007, 15:25:12 PM ---I agree totally,and lets not forget that the members did actually pay for the privilege of being members in season 1. Therefore why should someone who plays on BSQ take the cream of last seasons cake.

--- End quote ---


That is actually a very good point!!!!  :o

SteveTheRake:
I agree, should be password protected.

Buck Pete:

--- Quote from: APAT on November 05, 2007, 14:46:56 PM ---
when we get down to six players for the final table you can be assured that each will be interviewed thoroughly.

--- End quote ---


I"m sure we"d notice Barry Greenstein in a Groucho Marks nose and glasses disguise.

What official rules and regulations are in place when a well known Pro shows up at the final table?

APAT:
Say what you will, but the day APAT starts to turn new members away will be the day that the ethos behind the organisation dies.  Anyone in this thread who has suggested that we make this a closed event should think hard about that. 

Just because someone has not heard about APAT yet, does not make them "undeserving" of joining us or being able to see the value in what APAT does. 

One of the things that most pleases the team about APAT is that although there can only be one winner at our events, nearly everyone leaves happy.  We all work hard to create that and it would be a shame to start excluding players for the wrong reasons now.

Jon MW:
So can I be APAT's, "Pro Finder General", or not?

I"ll provide my own ducking stool  :)

(if they float, they must be a professional - then we can symbolically burn their stake money at the stake)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version