Poker Forum > Strategy
Hand from Today, what is best now?
Fatcatstu:
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on January 01, 2013, 19:08:14 PM ---
Grrrr posted and battery ran out!!
My thoughts in essence.
SB calling 2 raises rules out 55
MP getting action from 2 following his raise and only calling rules out Kk.
So only fearing his JJ. Ce la ve if so.
Pot bet for me, and calling any raise
--- End quote ---
Does it? At these stakes, I think that his calling 2 raises says he is likely to have a pp or KQ
I think SB can easily have 55 here and MP probably wakes up with AK, puts his initial raise in, which is re raised by Rodders, and called by SB, makes a call with AK particularly standard IMO.
Flop comes, and SB bets out (this is also in Rodders notes, whats the point in having them if you arent going to apply them in a situation where all the peices come together like this?) , MP has Top/Top and re raises.
I just sigh and fold here Rodders mate, move on to the next hand.
TheSnapper:
--- Quote from: Fatcatstu on January 01, 2013, 20:01:50 PM ---
Flop comes, and SB bets out (this is also in Rodders notes, whats the point in having them if you arent going to apply them in a situation where all the peices come together like this?) , MP has Top/Top and re raises.
I just sigh and fold here Rodders mate, move on to the next hand.
--- End quote ---
Notes were that he leads sets on wet flops, dont think it"s overly relevent in this spot though. Firstly it suggests he puts great stock in protecting his hand, that in mind, would he then lead for only half pot into a decent sized flop pot to protect a big hand?
Fatcatstu:
--- Quote from: TheSnapper on January 01, 2013, 20:15:17 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fatcatstu on January 01, 2013, 20:01:50 PM ---
Flop comes, and SB bets out (this is also in Rodders notes, whats the point in having them if you arent going to apply them in a situation where all the peices come together like this?) , MP has Top/Top and re raises.
I just sigh and fold here Rodders mate, move on to the next hand.
--- End quote ---
Notes were that he leads sets on wet flops, dont think it"s overly relevent in this spot though. Firstly it suggests he puts great stock in protecting his hand, that in mind, would he then lead for only half pot into a decent sized flop pot to protect a big hand?
--- End quote ---
I think that we need to apply it slightly differently in different situations though no? It certainly shows a tendency to bet/raise his big hands as early as possible, so I think we should take that into consideration on flops like this, where, IMO the action seems to tell me we are beaten.
Waz1892:
Far from me to argue with a England captain!! :) But as he is "really tight" surely calling after raise and call indictes to you (SB) your 55 is why behind?
Fatcatstu:
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on January 01, 2013, 22:20:26 PM ---
Far from me to argue with a England captain!! :) But as he is "really tight" surely calling after raise and call indictes to you (SB) your 55 is why behind?
--- End quote ---
Agreed, but people set mine incorrectly all the time at this level, so he flicks it in to see a 5 or fold IMO.,
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version