Poker Forum > General Discussion
Season Seven Discussion (Pre-Announcement)
SirPercival:
I think there should be a Men"s event. Women are obviously way better at the mind games and therefore have a significant advantage in poker. It"s therefore unfair that we have to compete in the same events.
In track and field we have the Men"s 100m and the Women"s 100m because of the physical differences, so why not in poker?
I realise this might not be in-keeping with the APAT ethos of inclusiveness and understand if it"s a non starter for that reason.
Paulie_D:
--- Quote from: SirPercival on February 15, 2013, 14:59:25 PM ---
I think there should be a Men"s event. Women are obviously way better at the mind games and therefore have a significant advantage in poker. It"s therefore unfair that we have to compete in the same events.
In track and field we have the Men"s 100m and the Women"s 100m because of the physical differences, so why not in poker?
I realise this might not be in-keeping with the APAT ethos of inclusiveness and understand if it"s a non starter for that reason.
--- End quote ---
+1
Let"s put "em back in the kitchen where they belong. ::)
KarmaDope:
--- Quote from: Waz1892 on February 15, 2013, 11:17:33 AM ---
--- Quote from: sharplea on February 15, 2013, 10:53:55 AM ---
I"d like to point out to Wax that the wooden spoon idea for first out was implemented by JAPAT in Vegas 2011. Paul Gildea was the unlucky "winner"!
--- End quote ---
I"ve been called some stuff before - :P
No copyright infringements were intended. :)
--- End quote ---
Oops...damn autocorrect on my phone!
Laxie:
--- Quote from: Paulie_D on February 15, 2013, 15:13:55 PM ---
--- Quote from: SirPercival on February 15, 2013, 14:59:25 PM ---
I think there should be a Men"s event. Women are obviously way better at the mind games and therefore have a significant advantage in poker. It"s therefore unfair that we have to compete in the same events.
In track and field we have the Men"s 100m and the Women"s 100m because of the physical differences, so why not in poker?
I realise this might not be in-keeping with the APAT ethos of inclusiveness and understand if it"s a non starter for that reason.
--- End quote ---
+1
Let"s put "em back in the kitchen where they belong. ::)
--- End quote ---
If I spend much more time in the kitchen, there won"t be an exercise on the planet that will help me.
Curlarge:
--- Quote from: Laxie on February 16, 2013, 13:04:26 PM ---
--- Quote from: Paulie_D on February 15, 2013, 15:13:55 PM ---
--- Quote from: SirPercival on February 15, 2013, 14:59:25 PM ---
I think there should be a Men"s event. Women are obviously way better at the mind games and therefore have a significant advantage in poker. It"s therefore unfair that we have to compete in the same events.
In track and field we have the Men"s 100m and the Women"s 100m because of the physical differences, so why not in poker?
I realise this might not be in-keeping with the APAT ethos of inclusiveness and understand if it"s a non starter for that reason.
--- End quote ---
+1
Let"s put "em back in the kitchen where they belong. ::)
--- End quote ---
If I spend much more time in the kitchen, there won"t be an exercise on the planet that will help me.
--- End quote ---
No sugar in mine thanks ;D ;D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version