Poker Forum > Strategy
betting patterns
Swinebag:
some players love this move with AA or KK
but a lot of donks will do this with low PPs 22-88.
I will call this with TT+ but will pass AK (if its early levels)
If the player is scoping well then I"ll pass everything bar KK and AA (but good scopers dont tend to do this)
LongshanksED:
yeah i notice the limper is usually holding 22 - 99 and the original raiser is holding AK, AQ, AJ
but the limpers plays dont really make alot of sense especially in early stages
the obvious tactic is to get in cheap and set mine but when raised i dont see how going all in is gonna chase the raiser out as they"ve defined a good hand by raising
Swinebag:
--- Quote from: LongshanksED on January 29, 2009, 10:47:21 AM ---
yeah i notice the limper is usually holding 22 - 99 and the original raiser is holding AK, AQ, AJ
--- End quote ---
you dont want to be racing the donks this early in a STT. Their game thrives on winning an early race and calling off light and hoping to get lucky later on
Pilf:
--- Quote from: LongshanksED on January 29, 2009, 10:47:21 AM ---
yeah i notice the limper is usually holding 22 - 99 and the original raiser is holding AK, AQ, AJ
but the limpers plays dont really make alot of sense especially in early stages
the obvious tactic is to get in cheap and set mine but when raised i dont see how going all in is gonna chase the raiser out as they"ve defined a good hand by raising
--- End quote ---
Although I don"t like this move of pushing to win 5/6 BBs (IMO a small pair should either call or reraise smaller which actually likely looks stronger to your opponent once it has limped) when you may have approx 50 BBs, I do not see how we can assume that the raiser has defined a good hand by raising?!?
LongshanksED:
maybe not defined but implied?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version